阿替卡因和利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉。
Articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
作者信息
Vähätalo K, Antila H, Lehtinen R
机构信息
Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Finland.
出版信息
Anesth Prog. 1993;40(4):114-6.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to compare the anesthetic properties of articaine hydrochloride with 1:200,000 epinephrine (Ultracain DS) and lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine (Xylocain-Adrenalin) for maxillary infiltration anesthesia. Twenty healthy dental student volunteers were included in this double-blind study. Each subject received 0.6 mL of each test solution at different times. Infiltration anesthesia was performed on the upper lateral incisor. The onset and duration of anesthesia were monitored using an electric pulp tester. No statistically significant differences were seen in the onset and duration of anesthesia between the articaine and lidocaine solutions.
摘要
本研究旨在比较含1:200,000肾上腺素的盐酸阿替卡因（复方阿替卡因）和含1:80,000肾上腺素的利多卡因（利多卡因-肾上腺素）用于上颌浸润麻醉的麻醉特性。20名健康牙科专业学生志愿者参与了这项双盲研究。每位受试者在不同时间接受0.6 mL每种测试溶液。在上颌侧切牙进行浸润麻醉。使用牙髓电活力测试仪监测麻醉的起效时间和持续时间。阿替卡因溶液和利多卡因溶液在麻醉起效时间和持续时间上未见统计学显著差异。
相似文献
1
Articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltration anesthesia.阿替卡因和利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉。
Anesth Prog. 1993;40(4):114-6.
2
Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.阿替卡因和利多卡因对上颌浸润麻醉的起效时间和持续时间。
Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar;36(3):197-201.
3
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
4
A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.比较含 1:100000 肾上腺素的 4%阿替卡因和含 1:80000 肾上腺素的 2%利多卡因在上颌牙髓炎牙齿中实现牙髓麻醉的效果。
J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
5
Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.使用计算机控制局部麻醉药输送系统进行初次韧带内注射时阿替卡因和利多卡因的疗效。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Mar;99(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.009.
6
Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.阿替卡因与利多卡因在下颌颊部浸润麻醉中的应用：一项前瞻性随机双盲交叉研究。
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):296-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.016. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
7
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因对上颌不可逆性牙髓炎患者进行颊侧浸润麻醉的效果比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jan;107(1):133-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.002.
8
Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.阿替卡因和利多卡因用于切牙/颏神经阻滞的麻醉效果。
J Endod. 2010 Mar;36(3):438-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.014.
9
A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis.阿替卡因与利多卡因在不可逆性牙髓炎患者中的麻醉效果比较。
J Endod. 2009 Feb;35(2):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.020. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
10
Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.阿替卡因与丙胺卡因在上颌和下颌牙弓浸润麻醉中的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1990 Sep-Oct;37(5):230-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Posterior superior alveolar nerve block alone in the extraction of upper third molars: a prospective clinical study.单独使用上牙槽后神经阻滞麻醉在上颌第三磨牙拔除术中的应用：一项前瞻性临床研究
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):213-220. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.4.213. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.阿替卡因的使用并未常规消除上颌第一磨牙拔除时腭侧注射的需要：一项随机交叉临床试验。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Dec;26(4):603-611. doi: 10.1007/s10006-021-01021-2. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Articaine in dentistry: an overview of the evidence and meta-analysis of the latest randomised controlled trials on articaine safety and efficacy compared to lidocaine for routine dental treatment.牙科中的阿替卡因：与利多卡因相比，阿替卡因用于常规牙科治疗的安全性和有效性的最新随机对照试验的证据概述及荟萃分析。
BDJ Open. 2021 Jul 17;7(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00082-5.
4
Pulpal Anesthesia of Adjacent Teeth Following Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine in the Maxillary Lateral Incisor and First Molar.在上颌侧切牙和第一磨牙中浸润注射含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因后相邻牙齿的牙髓麻醉
Anesth Prog. 2019 Spring;66(1):14-19. doi: 10.2344/anpr-65-04-03.
5
Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.无针喷射注射麻醉期间麻醉特性及疼痛的评估：一项随机临床试验
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jan 14;27:e20180195. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0195.
6
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.用于牙科麻醉的注射用局部麻醉剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7(7):CD006487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2.
7
4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery.在阻生下颌第三磨牙手术中，4%利多卡因与4%阿替卡因用于下牙槽神经阻滞的比较。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar;17(1):29-35. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.29. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.在下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中，比较阿替卡因和利多卡因在下牙槽神经阻滞术后颊部浸润用于术中疼痛控制的效果。
Anesth Prog. 2017 Summer;64(2):80-84. doi: 10.2344/anpr-64-02-06.
9
Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars.对于拔除已萌出的磨牙，使用阿替卡因进行浸润局部麻醉与使用利多卡因进行下牙槽神经阻滞的效果相同。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;21(3):295-299. doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0628-z. Epub 2017 May 25.
10
Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因在拔除第三磨牙手术中的麻醉效果：一项对比性前瞻性研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):356-61. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.171445.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of a digital pulp tester.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 Oct;58(4):437-42. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90340-2.
2
Effectivity of a new local analgesic Hoe 40 045.
Scand J Dent Res. 1972;80(4):272-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1972.tb00291.x.
3
Evaluation of carticaine - a new local analgesic.
Int J Oral Surg. 1974;3(6):422-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(74)80007-4.
4
A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HCl) and Citanest forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block.
J Can Dent Assoc. 1987 Jan;53(1):38-42.
5
[Local anesthetics. Properties, actions, pharmacokinetics].
Med Monatsschr Pharm. 1986 Jul;9(7):197-210.
6
Local anesthetics and sulphite sensitivity.
J Can Dent Assoc. 1988 May;54(5):349-52.
7
Local dental anaesthesia with lidocaine and adrenaline. Effects on plasma catecholamines, heart rate and blood pressure.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Dec;17(6):392-4. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80071-7.
8
Effects of anesthetics containing epinephrine on catecholamine levels during periodontal surgery.
J Periodontol. 1990 Sep;61(9):553-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.9.553.
9
Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.阿替卡因与丙胺卡因在上颌和下颌牙弓浸润麻醉中的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1990 Sep-Oct;37(5):230-7.
10
Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia.在浸润麻醉中，阿替卡因（必兰）和丙胺卡因（卡替诺）无差异效应。
J Can Dent Assoc. 1991 Mar;57(3):217-23.
Zotero 插件