Armstrong Terri S, Cohen Marlene Z, Eriksen Lillian, Cleeland Charles
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005 May 10;32(3):669-76. doi: 10.1188/05.ONF.669-676.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To illustrate one technique for establishing content validity of measurements using the initial development and testing of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module.
Published articles, book chapters, and subjective judgments of experts.
Content validity is the essential first step in the development of items to be included in a measurement instrument. Content validity is a criterion-referenced process that is judged by how well each item in a newly developed instrument reflects its respective objective or content domain. The stages in addressing content validity include a developmental stage and a judgment-quantification stage. Steps involved in the developmental stage include domain identification, item generation, and instrument formation. The judgment-quantification stage is when experts review the items and either report validity of the items subjectively or with an empirically referenced method, such as calculation of the content validity index. The content validity of a set of questions designed to measure symptoms in a population of patients with primary brain tumors was ascertained by using the calculation of the content validity index.
The final version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module consists of the 13 core items and 18 additional items designated as valid by a panel of experts. The instrument will be administered to a group of patients to determine construct validity and reliability of the items.
Self-report instruments are used to measure various health outcomes in oncology. Oncology nurses are in a key position to develop such instruments to be used in clinical care and research of symptoms associated with cancer. Understanding the process of content validation is an essential first step in developing new instruments.
目的/目标:通过MD安德森症状问卷脑肿瘤模块的初步开发和测试,阐述一种确定测量内容效度的技术。
已发表的文章、书籍章节以及专家的主观判断。
内容效度是开发测量工具中要纳入项目的关键第一步。内容效度是一个以标准为参照的过程,通过新开发工具中的每个项目在多大程度上反映其各自的目标或内容领域来判断。解决内容效度的阶段包括一个开发阶段和一个判断量化阶段。开发阶段涉及的步骤包括领域识别、项目生成和工具形成。判断量化阶段是专家审查项目并以主观方式报告项目效度,或以经验参照方法(如计算内容效度指数)报告项目效度的时候。通过计算内容效度指数确定了一组旨在测量原发性脑肿瘤患者群体症状的问题的内容效度。
MD安德森症状问卷脑肿瘤模块的最终版本由13个核心项目和18个经专家小组认定有效的附加项目组成。该工具将应用于一组患者,以确定项目的结构效度和信度。
自我报告工具用于测量肿瘤学中的各种健康结果。肿瘤学护士在开发此类用于癌症相关症状临床护理和研究的工具方面处于关键地位。理解内容验证过程是开发新工具的关键第一步。