Kile James C, Skowronski Stephen, Miller Mark D, Reissman Stephan G, Balaban Victor, Klomp Richard W, Reissman Dori B, Mainzer Hugh M, Dannenberg Andrew L
Division of Emergency and Environmental Health Services, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;20(2):93-7. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00002259.
In 2003, a major power outage occurred in the midwest and northeast United States affecting some 50 million people. The power outages affected multiple systems in state and local municipalities and, in turn, affected public health.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted using open-ended questionnaires, with a convenience sample of state- and locally selected subject matter experts from Ohio, Michigan, and New York. Respondents were interviewed in groups representing one of five areas of interest, including: (1) emergency preparedness; (2) hospital and emergency medical services; (3) municipal environmental systems; (4) public health surveillance and epidemiology; and (5) psychosocial and behavioral issues. The reported positive and negative impacts of the power outage on public health, medical services, and emergency preparedness and response were documented. Responses were categorized into common themes and recommendations were formulated.
The amount of time that the respondents' locations were without power ranged from <1 hour to 52 hours. Many common themes emerged from the different locations, including communications failures, alternate power source problems, manpower and training issues, and psychosocial concerns. There was minimal morbidity and mortality reported that could be attributed to the event.
Power outages negatively impacted multiple municipal infra-structures, and affected medical services, emergency response, and public health efforts. Previous federal funding positively impacted public health and emergency response capabilities. Recommendations were made based upon the common themes identified by the respondents. Recommendations may assist state and local health departments, medical service providers, and emergency responders in planning for future power outage problems.
2003年,美国中西部和东北部发生了一次重大停电事故,约5000万人受到影响。停电影响了州和地方市政当局的多个系统,进而影响了公共卫生。
采用开放式问卷进行半结构化访谈,从俄亥俄州、密歇根州和纽约州方便抽样选取州和地方的主题专家。受访者按代表五个感兴趣领域之一的小组接受访谈,这五个领域包括:(1)应急准备;(2)医院和紧急医疗服务;(3)市政环境系统;(4)公共卫生监测和流行病学;(5)心理社会和行为问题。记录了停电对公共卫生、医疗服务、应急准备和响应的报告的正面和负面影响。回答被归类为共同主题并制定了建议。
受访者所在地停电时间从不到1小时到52小时不等。不同地点出现了许多共同主题,包括通信故障、备用电源问题、人力和培训问题以及心理社会问题。报告称可归因于该事件的发病率和死亡率极低。
停电对多个市政基础设施产生了负面影响,并影响了医疗服务、应急响应和公共卫生工作。先前的联邦资金对公共卫生和应急响应能力产生了积极影响。根据受访者确定的共同主题提出了建议。这些建议可能有助于州和地方卫生部门、医疗服务提供者和应急响应人员规划未来的停电问题。