• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募配子捐赠者:对克拉夫特和桑希尔的回应

Recruiting gamete donors: response to Craft and Thornhill.

作者信息

Daniels Ken

机构信息

Department of Social Work, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):430-1.

PMID:15901446
Abstract

This response challenges the notion that paying more money, in whatever form, will overcome the anxieties of gamete donors regarding the removal of anonymity. An overview of the literature on payment and donor recruitment indicates that this is a complex issue. That literature does provide 'pointers' to the types of persons who should be 'targeted' in an information sharing and non-payment system. The experience in Sweden, both in relation to donor recruitment and parents' information-sharing with their children, is clarified, as the evidence is not always presented accurately.

摘要

这种回应质疑了这样一种观念,即无论以何种形式支付更多金钱,都将消除配子捐赠者对失去匿名性的担忧。关于支付与捐赠者招募的文献综述表明,这是一个复杂的问题。该文献确实为在信息共享和无支付体系中应“针对”的人群类型提供了“线索”。瑞典在捐赠者招募以及父母与子女信息共享方面的经验得到了澄清,因为相关证据的呈现并不总是准确无误。

相似文献

1
Recruiting gamete donors: response to Craft and Thornhill.招募配子捐赠者:对克拉夫特和桑希尔的回应
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):430-1.
2
Too late for change, too early to judge, but an oxymoron will not solve the problem.改变已为时过晚,评判尚言之过早,但矛盾修辞法并不能解决问题。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):433-5.
3
Commentary on Craft and Thornhill: new ethical strategies to recruit gamete donors.对克拉夫特和桑希尔的评论:招募配子捐赠者的新伦理策略
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):307-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61788-9.
4
Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?在瑞典的可识别供体立法出台二十年后:接受者夫妇是否准备好公开使用配子捐赠?
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):853-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq365. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
5
Would 'all-inclusive' compensation attract more gamete donors to balance their loss of anonymity?“全方位”补偿会吸引更多配子捐赠者来平衡他们匿名性的丧失吗?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61787-7.
6
Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.身份公开供精或供卵治疗后 111 对夫妇的披露行为和意向:随访至子女 1-4 岁。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Oct;27(10):2998-3007. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des285. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
7
Recruitment of gamete donors and payment of expenses.配子捐赠者的招募及费用支付。
Hum Reprod. 1998 May;13(5):1130-2. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019705.
8
Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients.取消匿名制会影响卵子捐赠者的招募吗?一项对既往捐赠者和受赠者的调查。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):325-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61791-9.
9
Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.拟议的立法变更要求追溯性披露身份识别信息:与捐赠者的磋商及政府回应
Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):286-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det434. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
10
Further HFEA restrictions on egg donation in the UK: two strikes and you're out!英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)对卵子捐赠的进一步限制:两次违规,就出局!
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):431-3.