• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)对卵子捐赠的进一步限制:两次违规,就出局!

Further HFEA restrictions on egg donation in the UK: two strikes and you're out!

作者信息

Sauer Mark V

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):431-3.

PMID:15901447
Abstract

The UK and Europe have lagged far behind the USA in the number of egg donation cycles performed over the past two decades. This disparity has been largely attributed to governmental restraints placed on the method within these locales, combined with the lack of regulation in the USA. Severely limiting donor compensation and requiring donors to be identified 18 years or more after their participation will undoubtedly lead to the demise of egg donation as the UK now knows it. Throwing more money at the problem, in the form of increased donor compensation, is unlikely to fix the shortage of participants that is to come. As already witnessed, increasing numbers of women and couples will probably seek treatment outside their native borders to escape the unreasonable demands placed upon their personal liberties by government. Regulation will promote 'reproductive tourism' as patients seek care in areas of the world where self-determination is protected by law.

摘要

在过去二十年里,英国和欧洲进行的卵子捐赠周期数量远远落后于美国。这种差距在很大程度上归因于这些地区政府对该方法施加的限制,以及美国缺乏相关监管。严格限制捐赠者补偿并要求在捐赠者参与18年后才允许被识别,无疑将导致英国目前所知的卵子捐赠走向衰落。以增加捐赠者补偿的形式投入更多资金,不太可能解决即将出现的参与者短缺问题。正如已经看到的,越来越多的女性和夫妇可能会在本国境外寻求治疗,以逃避政府对其个人自由提出的不合理要求。随着患者在世界上那些个人自主权受法律保护的地区寻求治疗,监管将促使“生殖旅游”的出现。

相似文献

1
Further HFEA restrictions on egg donation in the UK: two strikes and you're out!英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)对卵子捐赠的进一步限制:两次违规,就出局!
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):431-3.
2
Assisted reproduction: should egg and sperm donors be paid?辅助生殖:卵子和精子捐赠者应该获得报酬吗?
J Fam Health Care. 2010;20(2):69-71.
3
Too late for change, too early to judge, but an oxymoron will not solve the problem.改变已为时过晚,评判尚言之过早,但矛盾修辞法并不能解决问题。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):433-5.
4
Would 'all-inclusive' compensation attract more gamete donors to balance their loss of anonymity?“全方位”补偿会吸引更多配子捐赠者来平衡他们匿名性的丧失吗?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61787-7.
5
Recruiting gamete donors: response to Craft and Thornhill.招募配子捐赠者:对克拉夫特和桑希尔的回应
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):430-1.
6
Donating eggs for research--should the HFEA reconsider its policy on payments to egg donors?为研究捐献卵子——人类受精与胚胎学管理局是否应重新考虑其对卵子捐献者的付费政策?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Sep;15 Suppl 1:25-33. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60355-0.
7
Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients.取消匿名制会影响卵子捐赠者的招募吗?一项对既往捐赠者和受赠者的调查。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):325-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61791-9.
8
Should egg donors be paid?卵子捐赠者应该获得报酬吗?
BMJ. 1997 May 10;314(7091):1400-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1400.
9
Gametes, money, and egg sharing.配子、金钱与卵子共享。
Lancet. 2003 Aug 16;362(9383):584. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14141-4.
10
Egg donor solicitation: problems exist, but do abuses?
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Fall;1(4):1-2. doi: 10.1162/152651601317139199.

引用本文的文献

1
Payment of egg donors in stem cell research in the USA.美国干细胞研究中卵子捐赠者的报酬问题。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 May;18(5):603-8. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60002-8.