Parfrey Patrick S, Foley Robert N, Wittreich Barbara H, Sullivan Daniel J, Zagari Martin J, Frei Dieter
Division of Nephrology, Health Sciences Center, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3V6, Canada.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Jul;16(7):2180-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004121039. Epub 2005 May 18.
It is unclear whether physiologic hemoglobin targets lead to cardiac benefit in incident hemodialysis patients without symptomatic heart disease and left ventricular dilation. In this randomized, double-blind study, lower (9.5 to 11.5 g/dl) and higher (13.5 to 14.5 g/dl) hemoglobin targets were generated with epoetin alpha over 24 wk and maintained for an additional 72 wk. Major eligibility criteria included recent hemodialysis initiation and absence of symptomatic cardiac disease and left ventricular dilation. The primary outcome measure was left ventricular volume index (LVVI). The study enrolled 596 patients. Mean age, duration of dialysis therapy, baseline predialysis hemoglobin, and LVVI were 50.8 yr, 0.8 yr, 11.0 g/dl, and 69 ml/m2, respectively; 18% had diabetic nephropathy. Mean hemoglobin levels in the higher and lower target groups were 13.3 and 10.9 g/dl, respectively, at 24 wk. Percentage changes in LVVI between baseline and last value were similar (7.6% in the higher and 8.3% in the lower target group) as were the changes in left ventricular mass index (16.8 versus 14.2%). For the secondary outcomes, the only between-group difference was an improved SF-36 Vitality score in the higher versus the lower target group (1.21 versus -2.31; P = 0.036). Overall adverse event rates were similar in both target groups; higher (P < 0.05) rates of skeletal pain, surgery, and dizziness were seen in the lower target group, and headache and cerebrovascular events were seen in the higher target group. Normalization of hemoglobin in incident hemodialysis patients does not have a beneficial effect on cardiac structure, compared with partial correction.
对于没有症状性心脏病和左心室扩张的新发血液透析患者,生理性血红蛋白目标是否能带来心脏益处尚不清楚。在这项随机双盲研究中,使用促红细胞生成素α在24周内将血红蛋白目标设定为较低水平(9.5至11.5 g/dl)和较高水平(13.5至14.5 g/dl),并再维持72周。主要入选标准包括近期开始血液透析、无症状性心脏病和左心室扩张。主要结局指标是左心室容积指数(LVVI)。该研究纳入了596例患者。平均年龄、透析治疗时间、基线透析前血红蛋白和LVVI分别为50.8岁、0.8年、11.0 g/dl和69 ml/m²;18%患有糖尿病肾病。在24周时,较高目标组和较低目标组的平均血红蛋白水平分别为13.3 g/dl和10.9 g/dl。LVVI从基线到最后值的百分比变化相似(较高目标组为7.6%,较低目标组为8.3%),左心室质量指数的变化也相似(分别为16.8%和14.2%)。对于次要结局,组间唯一差异是较高目标组与较低目标组相比,SF-36活力评分有所改善(分别为1.21和 -2.31;P = 0.036)。两个目标组的总体不良事件发生率相似;较低目标组出现骨骼疼痛、手术和头晕的发生率较高(P < 0.05),较高目标组出现头痛和脑血管事件。与部分纠正相比,新发血液透析患者血红蛋白正常化对心脏结构没有有益影响。