Jacobson Mark W, Delis Dean C, Bondi Mark W, Salmon David P
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Feb;27(2):240-53. doi: 10.1080/13803390490515441.
Some studies of elderly individuals with the ApoE-e4 genotype noted subtle deficits on tests of attention such as the WAIS-R Digit Span subtest, but these findings have not been consistently reported. One possible explanation for the inconsistent results could be the presence of subgroups of e4+ individuals with asymmetric cognitive profiles (i.e., significant discrepancies between verbal and visuospatial skills). Comparing genotype groups with individual, modality-specific tests might obscure subtle differences between verbal and visuospatial attention in these asymmetric subgroups. In this study, we administered the WAIS-R Digit Span and WMS-R Visual Memory Span subtests to 21 nondemented elderly e4+ individuals and 21 elderly e4- individuals matched on age, education, and overall cognitive ability. We hypothesized that a) the e4+ group would show a higher incidence of asymmetric cognitive profiles when comparing Digit Span/Visual Memory Span performance relative to the e4- group; and (b) an analysis of individual test performance would fail to reveal differences between the two subject groups. Although the groups' performances were comparable on the individual attention span tests, the e4+ group showed a significantly larger discrepancy between digit span and spatial span scores compared to the e4- group. These findings suggest that contrast measures of modality-specific attentional skills may be more sensitive to subtle group differences in at-risk groups, even when the groups do not differ on individual comparisons of standardized test means. The increased discrepancy between verbal and visuospatial attention may reflect the presence of "subgroups" within the ApoE-e4 group that are qualitatively similar to asymmetric subgroups commonly associated with the earliest stages of AD.
一些针对携带载脂蛋白E - e4基因型的老年人的研究指出,在诸如韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS - R)数字广度分测验等注意力测试中存在细微缺陷,但这些研究结果并未得到一致报道。结果不一致的一个可能解释是,e4 +个体中存在认知特征不对称的亚组(即言语和视觉空间技能之间存在显著差异)。将基因型组与个体的、特定模态的测试进行比较,可能会掩盖这些不对称亚组中言语和视觉空间注意力之间的细微差异。在本研究中,我们对21名无痴呆的老年e4 +个体和21名在年龄、教育程度和整体认知能力上相匹配的老年e4 -个体进行了WAIS - R数字广度和韦氏记忆量表修订版(WMS - R)视觉记忆广度分测验。我们假设:a)相对于e4 -组,在比较数字广度/视觉记忆广度表现时,e4 +组将表现出更高比例的不对称认知特征;b)对个体测试表现的分析将无法揭示两个受试组之间的差异。尽管两组在个体注意力广度测试中的表现相当,但与e4 -组相比,e4 +组在数字广度和空间广度得分之间的差异明显更大。这些发现表明,即使在标准化测试均值的个体比较中两组没有差异,特定模态注意力技能的对比测量可能对高危组中的细微组间差异更敏感。言语和视觉空间注意力之间差异的增加可能反映了载脂蛋白E - e4组中存在“亚组”,这些亚组在性质上类似于通常与阿尔茨海默病最早阶段相关的不对称亚组。