Farina Dario, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Graven-Nielsen Thomas
Department of Health Science and Technology, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 D-3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;116(7):1558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.03.009.
The aim of this human study was to investigate if voluntary EMG activity and supra-maximal M-wave are affected by injection of hypertonic saline to experimentally induce muscle pain.
Surface EMG signals were recorded with an electrode array from the tibialis anterior muscle of 12 subjects. Two sets of 6 contractions, 3 electrically elicited and 3 voluntary (30% of the maximal force), alternated, were performed with each leg. During the second set of 6 contractions, hypertonic (painful; right leg) or isotonic (non-painful; left leg) saline was injected 3 times (0.2, 0.5, 0.9 ml), separated by 140 s, into the tibialis anterior.
In the voluntary contractions, EMG average rectified value (ARV) significantly decreased (mean+/-SE, 13.2 +/- 4.2%) with increasing pain, although the exerted torque was unaltered. Conduction velocity (CV) (4.2 +/- 0.2 and 4.4 +/- 0.3 m/s, right and left leg, respectively) and mean power spectral frequency (MPF) (119.0 +/- 8.4 and 119.5+/-8.9 Hz) were not affected by the injection of hypertonic saline. In the electrically elicited contractions, M-wave CV (4.6 +/- 0.3 and 4.7 +/- 0.2 m/s), ARV (748.6 +/- 101.8 and 822.3 +/- 104.4 microV), and MPF (72.0+/-5.1 and 76.9+/-4.8 Hz) did not change with pain.
Injection of hypertonic saline did not change muscle fiber conduction velocity or impaire neuromuscular transmission. The decrease in voluntary EMG activity with injection of hypertonic saline was thus due to central factors.
The injection of hypertonic saline provides a model for exciting nociceptive afferents without affecting muscle fiber electrophysiological properties.
本人体研究旨在探究向肌肉注射高渗盐水以实验性诱导肌肉疼痛时,随意肌电图(EMG)活动和最大M波是否受到影响。
用电极阵列记录12名受试者胫前肌的表面肌电信号。每条腿进行两组各6次收缩,每组包括3次电诱发收缩和3次随意收缩(最大力量的30%),两组收缩交替进行。在第二组6次收缩过程中,分别向右侧胫前肌注射3次高渗盐水(引起疼痛),每次注射0.2、0.5、0.9毫升,每次注射间隔140秒;向左侧胫前肌注射3次等渗盐水(不引起疼痛)。
在随意收缩中,随着疼痛加剧,肌电平均整流值(ARV)显著降低(均值±标准误,降低了13.2±4.2%),尽管施加的扭矩未改变。传导速度(CV)(右侧腿为4.2±0.2米/秒,左侧腿为4.4±0.3米/秒)和平均功率谱频率(MPF)(右侧腿为119.0±8.4赫兹,左侧腿为119.5±8.9赫兹)不受高渗盐水注射的影响。在电诱发收缩中,M波CV(右侧腿为4.6±0.3米/秒,左侧腿为4.7±0.2米/秒)、ARV(右侧腿为748.6±101.8微伏,左侧腿为822.3±104.4微伏)和MPF(右侧腿为72.0±5.1赫兹,左侧腿为76.9±4.8赫兹)不随疼痛而改变。
注射高渗盐水不会改变肌纤维传导速度或损害神经肌肉传递。因此,注射高渗盐水后随意肌电活动的降低是由中枢因素导致的。
注射高渗盐水提供了一种在不影响肌纤维电生理特性的情况下激发伤害性传入神经的模型。