Drake Lisa A, Jenkins Philip T, Dobbs Fred C
Department of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, 4600 Elkhorn Avenue, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2005 May;50(5):560-5. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.01.015. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
In examining ship-mediated biological invasions, most research and treatment development has focused on ballast water. Another vector that has gained attention recently is vessels arriving in a "no ballast on board" (NOBOB) condition. Such ships retain relatively small, unpumpable volumes of water and sediment in their ballast tanks. Nonetheless, these unpumpable portions can represent great ecological risk. This scenario is relevant in the Great Lakes, which have experienced a dramatic series of introductions, despite most vessels arriving there as NOBOBs since 1994. We examined shipping patterns of NOBOBs arriving to lower Chesapeake Bay to begin evaluating their risk of biopollution. Only 14% of ships arrive as NOBOBs, and of those, 17% depart to another port in the upper bay. Most NOBOBs arrive from or leave for other US ports; proximate trans-Atlantic crossings are few. Given the nature of their operations, we conclude NOBOBs may represent a risk for aquatic nuisance species invasions to Chesapeake Bay.
在研究船舶介导的生物入侵时,大多数研究和治理发展都集中在压舱水方面。最近受到关注的另一个媒介是抵达时处于“无压舱水”(NOBOB)状态的船只。这类船舶在其压载舱中留存的水量和沉积物相对较少,无法泵送。尽管如此,这些无法泵送的部分仍可能带来巨大的生态风险。这种情况在五大湖地区很常见,尽管自1994年以来大多数抵达那里的船只都是无压舱水状态,但该地区还是经历了一系列引人注目的物种引入事件。我们研究了抵达切萨皮克湾下游的无压舱水船只的运输模式,以开始评估它们造成生物污染的风险。只有14%的船只抵达时处于无压舱水状态,其中17%会驶往海湾上游的另一个港口。大多数无压舱水船只往返于美国其他港口;近距离的跨大西洋航行很少。鉴于其运营性质,我们得出结论,无压舱水船只可能会给切萨皮克湾带来水生有害物种入侵的风险。