Metsänen M, Wahlberg K-E, Hakko H, Saarento O, Tienari P
Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, Fin-15850, Lahti, Finland.
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Apr;40(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.03.004.
Thought disturbances are commonly associated with psychiatric disorders, especially schizophrenia. Our aim was to clarify whether thought disorders are only stable at certain severity levels and in the presence of certain schizophrenia factors of the Thought Disorder Index (TDI) scale. Furthermore, we also examined the significance of genetic status and the psychiatric disorder for the persistence of TDI severity levels and factors.
The thought disorders of 158 adoptees genetically at high-risk or low-risk for schizophrenia participating the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia were evaluated twice at a mean interval of 11 years. Thought Disorder Index (TDI) was used to assess the severity levels and schizophrenia factors. TDI identifies 23 different items of thinking disturbances, which are weighted along a continuum of severity.
Thought disorders at the 0.50 and 0.75 severity levels and idiosyncratic verbalization indicative of the schizophrenia factors turned out to be stable phenomena throughout the follow-up period. The adoptees' genetic or psychiatric status was not associated with the results.
The study shows that the stability of TDI seems to be related to the most severe categories of thought disorders. However, of the specific schizophrenia factors, idiosyncratic verbalization, but not confusion and fluid thinking, showed stability over time. Although idiosyncratic verbalization does not necessarily represent the most severe type of thought disturbance, it turned out relatively stable and we can speculate that idiosyncratic verbalization have some predictive value, too.
思维障碍通常与精神疾病相关,尤其是精神分裂症。我们的目的是阐明思维障碍是否仅在某些严重程度水平以及存在思维障碍指数(TDI)量表的某些精神分裂症因素时才稳定。此外,我们还研究了基因状态和精神疾病对TDI严重程度水平和因素持续性的意义。
对参与芬兰精神分裂症收养家庭研究的158名精神分裂症遗传高危或低危的被收养者的思维障碍进行了两次评估,平均间隔11年。思维障碍指数(TDI)用于评估严重程度水平和精神分裂症因素。TDI识别出23种不同的思维障碍项目,这些项目根据严重程度连续体进行加权。
在整个随访期间,0.50和0.75严重程度水平的思维障碍以及表明精神分裂症因素的特质性言语表达是稳定现象。被收养者的基因或精神状态与结果无关。
该研究表明,TDI的稳定性似乎与最严重的思维障碍类别有关。然而,在特定的精神分裂症因素中,特质性言语表达而非思维混乱和思维流畅性随时间显示出稳定性。尽管特质性言语表达不一定代表最严重的思维障碍类型,但它相对稳定,我们可以推测特质性言语表达也具有一定的预测价值。