Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Nov;37(6):1136-46. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr092. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
It was recently hypothesized by Lake (Schizophrenia Bulletin 2008; 34: 109-117) that Formal Thought Disorder (FTD) can be accounted for by a single disorder that is currently diagnosed as bipolar disorder.
This study aimed to analyze the underlying dimensions of FTD and to examine to what extent FTD factors can be accounted for by clinical distractibility, attentional impairment, severity of mania, and familial liability of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
Six hundred and sixty inpatients were assessed using a semistructured interview, and FTDs were assessed with the Thought, Language, and Communication scale. "Inattentiveness during Mental Status Testing" item of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms scale and a composite mania score were used. The Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria was used.
FTD is a multidimensional construct comprised at least 5 dimensions: disorganization, verbosity, poverty of speech, idiosyncratic thinking, and blocking. Clinical distractibility loadings split in 2 factors, disorganization and blocking, but it did not load on the mania-related (verbosity) factor. Attentional disturbance was significantly associated with each FTD factor except for idiosyncratic thinking, and these associations were largely independent from the severity of mania. The associations of FTDs with mania and attentional disturbances were independent from each other. FTD factors were not significantly associated with familial liability to bipolar or to schizophrenia.
Disorganization was the main FTD component. Distractibility was a core feature of FTD factors but it was not specifically accounted for by mania-related attentional impairment. The hypothesis of mutual interdependence between mania and attentional disturbance leading to FTDs could not be confirmed.
最近,Lake(《精神分裂症通报》2008 年;34:109-117)提出假设,即形式思维障碍(FTD)可以归因于一种目前被诊断为双相情感障碍的单一障碍。
本研究旨在分析 FTD 的潜在维度,并探讨 FTD 因素在多大程度上可以归因于临床注意力不集中、注意力损害、躁狂严重程度以及双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的家族易感性。
对 660 名住院患者进行半结构化访谈评估,并使用思维、语言和沟通量表评估 FTD。使用 Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms 量表的“Inattentiveness during Mental Status Testing”项目和综合躁狂评分。使用家族史-研究诊断标准。
FTD 是一个多维度的结构,至少包括 5 个维度:思维紊乱、言语过多、言语贫乏、特异性思维和阻滞。临床注意力不集中的负荷分为 2 个因素,即思维紊乱和阻滞,但它没有加载在与躁狂相关的(言语过多)因素上。注意力障碍与除特异性思维外的每个 FTD 因素显著相关,这些关联在很大程度上独立于躁狂的严重程度。FTD 与躁狂和注意力障碍的关联相互独立。FTD 因素与双相情感障碍或精神分裂症的家族易感性无显著关联。
思维紊乱是 FTD 的主要成分。注意力不集中是 FTD 因素的核心特征,但它不能被与躁狂相关的注意力损害所具体解释。躁狂和注意力障碍相互依存导致 FTD 的假设无法得到证实。