Lappa E
General Hospital Kat, Athens, Greece.
Health Info Libr J. 2005 Jun;22(2):124-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2005.00563.x.
The primary focus of this pilot study was to gain a better understanding of the information needs of emergency-care clinicians. The secondary focus was to compare the traditional current practice of information provision within other emergency departments in Greek hospitals, with the new model of clinical librarianship (CL).
Clinical staff in the emergency department deal with a variety of cases, they have no time to visit the library, but need information instantly in their place of work. Clinical decision making in the emergency department setting frequently requires the clinician to obtain additional sources of information and clinical librarians may facilitate this.
The present study focused on two professional groups: medical librarians (group A) and clinicians (consultants, senior registrars, registrars, nurses (group B), working in the emergency departments of two Greek hospitals. The study was organized through a questionnaire survey and some in-depth interviews.
This study showed that, for 100% of the clinicians in daily practice, the main information needs arise while treating patients, and that information would help in making patient-care decisions. Clinicians made little use of hospital libraries because they are usually under tremendous time pressure. The main outcome of the study was the use of a clinical librarian as an information provider. Clinical librarians supply information to assist decisions, based on this model. This extends the librarian's role in evidence-based medicine, giving much stronger attention to the relevant evidence in clinical practice.
Nowadays, health services are facing organizational change. The introduction of new technology, and rapid growth of medical knowledge creates a demand for new ways of providing information. Clinical librarian programmes may deliver patients specific information in a timely manner. The mission of the clinical librarian is to facilitate access to quality information which is necessary for improving health, and to act as an informationist in the emergency department.
本试点研究的主要重点是更好地了解急诊护理临床医生的信息需求。次要重点是将希腊医院其他急诊科传统的当前信息提供做法与临床图书馆学新模式(CL)进行比较。
急诊科的临床工作人员处理各种病例,他们没有时间去图书馆,但需要在工作场所即时获取信息。急诊科环境中的临床决策经常要求临床医生获取额外的信息来源,而临床图书馆员可能会对此提供便利。
本研究聚焦于两个专业群体:在希腊两家医院急诊科工作的医学图书馆员(A组)和临床医生(顾问、高级住院医师、住院医师、护士,B组)。该研究通过问卷调查和一些深入访谈进行组织。
本研究表明,在日常实践中,100%的临床医生的主要信息需求出现在治疗患者时,并且这些信息有助于做出患者护理决策。临床医生很少利用医院图书馆,因为他们通常承受着巨大的时间压力。该研究的主要成果是使用临床图书馆员作为信息提供者。基于此模式,临床图书馆员提供信息以协助决策。这扩展了图书馆员在循证医学中的作用,更加注重临床实践中的相关证据。
如今,卫生服务正面临组织变革。新技术的引入和医学知识的快速增长产生了对新的信息提供方式的需求。临床图书馆员计划可能会及时为患者提供特定信息。临床图书馆员的使命是促进获取改善健康所需的高质量信息,并在急诊科充当信息专家。