Suppr超能文献

新兴的信息专家专业:文献系统综述

The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Rankin Jocelyn A, Grefsheim Suzanne F, Canto Candace C

机构信息

CDC Information Center, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop C04, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Jul;96(3):194-206. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.3.005.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A systematic literature review was conducted to synthesize what is known about informationists, highlight program models, and suggest areas for future research.

METHODS

Articles retrieved through database searching were reviewed for relevance. Informationist case reports were identified and coded according to an attributes checklist. Data from other retained publications were synthesized under broad themes. The few research studies found were reviewed for level of evidence.

RESULTS

Of 113 papers reviewed, the study identified 7 classic and 8 emerging informationist programs. Two major models are apparent, clinical and research, with priorities differing according to program maturity. The literature synthesis also brought together current thinking about informationist qualifications; practice roles; setting characteristics; education and training; organizational, programmatic, and service provider success factors; and challenges and barriers. Program outcomes to date are reported, and future research topics suggested. Specific findings will assist informationist program planners.

CONCLUSIONS

While the informationist concept remains in the early adopter stage, it appears that domain knowledge, continuous learning, and embedding (working in context) are essential to success. The need for librarians to transition to greater specialization and libraries to emphasize customized service was underscored. A research agenda focused on information management, dissemination, behaviors, and economics is proposed.

摘要

目的

进行一项系统的文献综述,以综合关于信息专家的已知信息,突出项目模式,并提出未来研究的领域。

方法

对通过数据库检索获得的文章进行相关性审查。根据属性清单识别并编码信息专家案例报告。来自其他留存出版物的数据在宽泛主题下进行综合。对所发现的少数研究进行证据水平审查。

结果

在审查的113篇论文中,该研究识别出7个经典和8个新兴的信息专家项目。有两种主要模式很明显,即临床模式和研究模式,其优先事项根据项目成熟度而有所不同。文献综述还汇集了当前关于信息专家资质、实践角色、环境特征、教育与培训、组织、项目及服务提供者成功因素以及挑战与障碍的思考。报告了迄今为止的项目成果,并提出了未来研究主题。具体研究结果将有助于信息专家项目规划者。

结论

虽然信息专家概念仍处于早期采用阶段,但领域知识、持续学习和融入(在实际环境中工作)似乎对成功至关重要。强调了图书馆员向更高专业化转型以及图书馆强调定制服务的必要性。提出了一个专注于信息管理、传播、行为和经济学的研究议程。

相似文献

4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
A core competency model for clinical informationists.临床信息专家的核心能力模型。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):33-43. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1065.
3
The clinical informationist as a new member of clinical team.临床信息专家作为临床团队的新成员。
J Res Med Sci. 2020 Aug 31;25:83. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_578_20. eCollection 2020.
4
6
Assessing the National Library of Medicine's Informationist Awards.评估美国国立医学图书馆的信息专家奖。
J Escience Librariansh. 2016;5(1). doi: 10.7191/jeslib.2016.1095. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

7
Working towards the informationist.朝着信息专家的方向努力。
Health Informatics J. 2006 Mar;12(1):41-8. doi: 10.1177/1460458206061207.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验