• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索中基于颜色的分组与抑制:来自预览搜索探测检测分析的证据

Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.

作者信息

Braithwaite Jason J, Humphreys Glyn W, Hulleman Johan

机构信息

Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, England.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jan;67(1):81-101. doi: 10.3758/bf03195014.

DOI:10.3758/bf03195014
PMID:15912874
Abstract

In four experiments, we examined selection processes in visual search using a probe detection task to measure the allocation of attention. Under preview search conditions, probes were harder to detect on old relative to new distractors (Experiment 1). This cannot be attributed solely to low-level sensory factors (Experiment 2). In addition, probe detection was sensitive to color-based grouping of old distractors and to color similarity between old distractors (Experiments 3 and 4). These effects were dissociated when the color of the old distractors changed but probe detection effects remained. Collectively, the data indicate both group-based suppression of distractors and the separate inhibition of distractor features in search.

摘要

在四项实验中,我们使用探测检测任务来测量注意力分配,以此检验视觉搜索中的选择过程。在预搜索条件下,相对于新的干扰项,探测物在旧干扰项上更难被检测到(实验1)。这不能仅仅归因于低水平的感觉因素(实验2)。此外,探测检测对旧干扰项基于颜色的分组以及旧干扰项之间的颜色相似性敏感(实验3和4)。当旧干扰项的颜色发生变化但探测检测效果仍然存在时,这些效应被区分开来。总体而言,数据表明在搜索中存在基于组的干扰项抑制以及干扰项特征的单独抑制。

相似文献

1
Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.视觉搜索中基于颜色的分组与抑制:来自预览搜索探测检测分析的证据
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jan;67(1):81-101. doi: 10.3758/bf03195014.
2
Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.基于特征的灵活抑制在视觉搜索中调节了选择的放大损伤:来自动态预视搜索条件下的传递效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1007-16. doi: 10.1037/a0023505.
3
No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.没有预览就是好消息:利用预览搜索探究分类分组以进行定向。
Vision Res. 2007 May;47(11):1464-78. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.027. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
4
Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.视觉搜索中的抑制与预期:来自颜色预知对预览搜索影响的证据。
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):213-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03194796.
5
Fast color grouping and slow color inhibition: evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search.快速颜色分组与慢速颜色抑制:预览搜索中不同过程存在不同时间窗口的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):503-17. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.503.
6
History matters: the preview benefit in search is not onset capture.历史很重要:搜索中的预览优势并非起始捕捉。
Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):181-5. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01439.
7
Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality.在搜索中对预览收益进行分解:通过时间和模态对视觉标记进行双任务分解。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):640-60. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.640.
8
Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Jul;63(5):918-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03194447.
9
An object-based cost of visual filtering.
Percept Psychophys. 2000 Apr;62(3):482-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03212100.
10
Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition.跨维度干扰与跨试验抑制。
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Apr;64(3):493-503. doi: 10.3758/bf03194720.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.视觉搜索中优先选择拒绝的皮质机制。
J Neurosci. 2018 May 16;38(20):4738-4748. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2407-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
2
Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.在扩展视野中,在干扰物中定位目标时与年龄相关的差异变化。
Eur J Ageing. 2016 Oct 11;14(2):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0399-7. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.
背景亮度或运动的剧烈变化会降低预览效果。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 24;8:1252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01252. eCollection 2017.
4
Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.对单一干扰项的注意捕获会降低视觉搜索中的视觉标记。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 16;8:801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00801. eCollection 2017.
5
Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.基于颜色和预览的子集选择性搜索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):85-99. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1211-7.
6
Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display.基于客体的注意与相关性值之间的相互作用塑造了多元素显示的注意优先级图谱。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):866-877. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000194. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.作为搜索中一种绑定机制的并行干扰物抑制
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 9;3:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278. eCollection 2012.
8
Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.视觉空间选择性注意中的信号增强和抑制。
Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:155-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.076. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
9
Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):852-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03194111.
10
Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?视觉工作记忆的内容在视觉搜索过程中会自动影响注意力的选择吗?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):363-77. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.363.