Souter Nigel J, Messer Harold H
Department of Endodontics, School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Endod. 2005 Jun;31(6):450-2. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000148148.98255.15.
A technique utilizing modified Gates Glidden burs and ultrasonics has recently been advocated to remove fractured instruments from root canals. Varying extents of tooth structure are removed during this procedure, potentially leading to complications. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo complications associated with fractured file removal. Fractured instrument fragments were removed from three different levels (coronal, middle, or apical third) of mesiolingual canals of extracted human mandibular molars. The success rate, frequency of perforations, and root strength were recorded for each group. Perforations and unsuccessful file removal occurred only with fragments lodged in the apical third. Fracture resistance declined significantly with more apically located file fragments. A review of 60 clinical cases showed similar rates of successful file removal and rate of perforations. Removal of a fractured file fragment from the apical third of curved canals should not be routinely attempted.
最近有人提倡使用改良的盖茨-格利登钻和超声技术从根管中取出折断器械。在此过程中会去除不同程度的牙齿结构,这可能会导致并发症。本研究评估了与取出折断锉相关的体外和体内并发症。从拔除的人类下颌磨牙近中舌根管的三个不同水平(冠部、中部或根尖三分之一)取出折断器械碎片。记录每组的成功率、穿孔频率和牙根强度。仅当碎片位于根尖三分之一处时才会发生穿孔和锉取出失败。随着锉碎片位置更靠近根尖,抗折性显著下降。对60例临床病例的回顾显示,锉取出成功率和穿孔率相似。不应常规尝试从弯曲根管的根尖三分之一处取出折断的锉碎片。