Patel Sunil J, Shapiro William R, Laske Douglas W, Jensen Randy L, Asher Anthony L, Wessels Barry W, Carpenter Susan P, Shan Joseph S
Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2005 Jun;56(6):1243-52; discussion 1252-3. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000159649.71890.30.
We report the safety and feasibility of using convection-enhanced delivery to administer Cotara (Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tustin, CA), a novel radioimmunotherapeutic agent, to patients with malignant glioma.
Between April 1998 and November 2002, 51 patients with histologically confirmed malignant glioma received Cotara by convection-enhanced delivery. Most patients (88%) were treated with Cotara targeting tumor volume-dependent, single or multiple administrations of activity ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 mCi/cm3 of baseline clinical target volume. Two weeks after infusion, single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging determined the spatial distribution of Cotara. Patients were followed for as long as 41 months (average follow-up, 5 mo). Safety was evaluated on the basis of incidence of procedure-related, neurological, and systemic adverse events. Feasibility was evaluated in a subset of patients on the basis of the correlation between the prescribed activity and the actual activity administered to the targeted region.
Fifty-one patients, 37 with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, 8 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme, and 6 with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas, were treated. Average tumor volume was 36 +/- 27.6 cm3 (range, 5-168 cm3). Of the 67 infusions, 13 (19%), 52 (78%), and 2 (3%) delivered less than 90%, 100 +/- 10%, and more than 110%, respectively, of the prescribed administered activity to the targeted region. Treatment-emergent, drug-related central nervous system adverse events included brain edema (16%), hemiparesis (14%), and headache (14%). Systemic adverse events were mild. Several patients had objective responses to Cotara.
The majority of Cotara infusions delivered between 90 and 110% of the prescribed administered activity to the targeted region. This method of administration has an acceptable safety profile compared with literature reports of other therapeutics delivered by convection-enhanced delivery.
我们报告了使用对流增强给药法向恶性胶质瘤患者施用新型放射免疫治疗药物Cotara(派瑞金制药公司,加利福尼亚州图斯廷)的安全性和可行性。
在1998年4月至2002年11月期间,51例经组织学确诊的恶性胶质瘤患者通过对流增强给药法接受了Cotara治疗。大多数患者(88%)接受了以肿瘤体积为依据的Cotara治疗,对基线临床靶体积进行单次或多次给药,活性范围为0.5至3.0毫居里/立方厘米。输注两周后,单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像确定了Cotara的空间分布。对患者进行了长达41个月的随访(平均随访时间为5个月)。根据与手术相关的、神经学的和全身性不良事件的发生率评估安全性。在一部分患者中,根据规定活性与施用于靶区域的实际活性之间的相关性评估可行性。
治疗了51例患者,其中37例为复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤,8例为新诊断的多形性胶质母细胞瘤,6例为复发性间变性星形细胞瘤。平均肿瘤体积为36±27.6立方厘米(范围为5至168立方厘米)。在67次输注中,分别有13次(19%)、52次(78%)和2次(3%)向靶区域输送的活性低于规定给药活性的90%、100±10%和高于110%。治疗中出现的、与药物相关的中枢神经系统不良事件包括脑水肿(16%)、偏瘫(14%)和头痛(14%)。全身性不良事件较轻。有几名患者对Cotara有客观反应。
大多数Cotara输注向靶区域输送的活性为规定给药活性的90%至110%。与文献报道的通过对流增强给药法递送的其他治疗方法相比,这种给药方法具有可接受的安全性。