• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults.测量糖尿病自我管理:对成人修订版自我管理量表的心理测量分析
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1346-52. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1346.
2
Psychometric validation of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised (SCI-R) in UK adults with type 2 diabetes using data from the AT.LANTUS Follow-on study.使用 AT.LANTUS 随访研究的数据对英国 2 型糖尿病成人患者的自我护理量表修订版(SCI-R)进行心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Feb 26;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-24.
3
The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes.糖尿病自我护理信心量表:荷兰和美国1型糖尿病患者中一种新的糖尿病特异性自我效能感测量方法的心理测量特性
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):713-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.713.
4
Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: the Self-Care Inventory (SCI).1型糖尿病依从行为青少年及家长评定量表的效度与信度:自我护理量表(SCI)
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Oct;34(9):999-1007. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp032. Epub 2009 May 7.
5
Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education?当前的心理测量工具是否适用于衡量糖尿病教育的成果?
Diabet Med. 2009 Apr;26(4):425-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02697.x.
6
Assessing self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes management: validation of the Italian version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (IT-DMSES).评估 2 型糖尿病管理中的自我效能感:糖尿病管理自我效能量表(IT-DMSES)意大利版本的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 23;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0901-3.
7
Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS).成人糖尿病相关情绪困扰:糖尿病问题区域量表(PAID)和糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)挪威语版本的信度和效度。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Feb;49(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
Measuring self-care in the general adult population: development and psychometric testing of the Self-Care Inventory.测量一般成年人群的自我护理能力:自我护理量表的编制和心理测量学检验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12913-7.
9
Development and psychometric testing of a theory-based tool to measure self-care in diabetes patients: the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory.一种基于理论的糖尿病患者自我护理测量工具的开发与心理测量测试:糖尿病自我护理量表。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12902-017-0218-y.
10
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale.中文版糖尿病管理自我效能量表的编制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.020. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
How time and risk preferences affect glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients.时间和风险偏好如何影响2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16791-y.
2
Diabetes-related posttraumatic stress symptoms, resilience, and illness management among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: an exploratory study.1型糖尿病青少年和青年中与糖尿病相关的创伤后应激症状、复原力及疾病管理:一项探索性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 23;16:1615273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1615273. eCollection 2025.
3
Design of the type 1 diabetes and life (T1DAL) pilot and feasibility study: A brief telehealth intervention targeting health-related quality of life across clinical settings.1型糖尿病与生活(T1DAL)试点及可行性研究设计:一项针对跨临床环境的健康相关生活质量的简短远程医疗干预措施。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 May 13;45:101491. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101491. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Executive Functioning, Diabetes Distress, and Diabetes Management Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Youth and Parent Perspectives.1型糖尿病青少年的执行功能、糖尿病困扰与糖尿病管理:青少年及其父母的观点
Pediatr Diabetes. 2025 Feb 27;2025:7036544. doi: 10.1155/pedi/7036544. eCollection 2025.
5
Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Self-Care in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes-An Integrative Literature Review.人工智能作为1型和2型糖尿病患者自我护理工具的综合文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 21;13(8):950. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080950.
6
Psychological and self care outcomes for children and adolescents living with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers attending diabetes camp: A mixed methods study.参加糖尿病营的1型糖尿病患儿及其照顾者的心理和自我护理结果:一项混合方法研究。
Diabet Med. 2025 Jun;42(6):e70038. doi: 10.1111/dme.70038. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
7
The moderating role of e-health literacy and patient-physician communication in the relationship between online diabetes information-seeking behavior and self-care practices among individuals with type 2 diabetes.电子健康素养和医患沟通在2型糖尿病患者在线糖尿病信息寻求行为与自我护理实践关系中的调节作用。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 30;25(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02695-9.
8
Discordant Medication Beliefs in Black Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Diabetes.轻度认知障碍和糖尿病黑人个体中不一致的用药观念
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;33(4):337-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
9
Examining Share plus-A Continuous Glucose Monitoring Plus Data-Sharing Intervention in Older Adults and Their Care Partners: Protocol for a Randomized Control Study.评估“共享加”——一项针对老年人及其护理伙伴的持续血糖监测加数据共享干预措施:一项随机对照研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 16;13:e60004. doi: 10.2196/60004.
10
DiaBetter Together: Clinical trial protocol for a strengths-based Peer Mentor intervention for young adults with type 1 diabetes transitioning to adult care.携手改善糖尿病:一项针对向成人护理过渡的 1 型糖尿病青年成人的基于优势的同伴指导干预临床试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;147:107713. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107713. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Directive and nondirective social support in diabetes management.糖尿病管理中的指导性和非指导性社会支持
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(2):131-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0402_3.
2
The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes.糖尿病自我护理信心量表:荷兰和美国1型糖尿病患者中一种新的糖尿病特异性自我效能感测量方法的心理测量特性
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):713-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.713.
3
Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire.糖尿病问题领域(PAID)问卷的反应性
Diabet Med. 2003 Jan;20(1):69-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00832.x.
4
Parenting styles, regimen adherence, and glycemic control in 4- to 10-year-old children with diabetes.4至10岁糖尿病患儿的养育方式、治疗方案依从性及血糖控制
J Pediatr Psychol. 2001 Mar;26(2):123-9. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/26.2.123.
5
Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale.荷兰和美国糖尿病患者中与糖尿病相关的情绪困扰:糖尿病问题领域量表的跨文化效度
Diabetes Care. 2000 Sep;23(9):1305-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1305.
6
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.糖尿病自我护理活动量表总结:7项研究结果及修订版量表
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
7
Comparing outpatient and inpatient diabetes education for newly diagnosed pediatric patients.比较新诊断的儿科患者门诊和住院糖尿病教育情况。
Diabetes Educ. 1999 Nov-Dec;25(6):895-906. doi: 10.1177/014572179902500607.
8
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.磺脲类或胰岛素强化血糖控制与传统治疗及2型糖尿病患者并发症风险的比较(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究[UKPDS 33])。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)小组
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
9
The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility.糖尿病问题领域量表。对其临床效用的评估。
Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):760-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.760.
10
Adherence in diabetes: can we define it and can we measure it?糖尿病中的依从性:我们能对其进行定义并测量吗?
Diabetes Care. 1997 Feb;20(2):215-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.2.215.

测量糖尿病自我管理:对成人修订版自我管理量表的心理测量分析

Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults.

作者信息

Weinger Katie, Butler Heather A, Welch Garry W, La Greca Annette M

机构信息

EdD, Section on Behavior and Mental Health Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, 1 Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1346-52. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1346.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.28.6.1346
PMID:15920050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1615849/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine psychometric properties of the Self-Care Inventory-revised (SCI-R), a self-report measure of perceived adherence to diabetes self-care recommendations, among adults with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used three data sets of adult type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients to examine psychometric properties of the SCI-R. Principal component and factor analyses examined whether a general factor or common factors were present. Associations with measures of theoretically related concepts were examined to assess SCI-R concurrent and convergent validity. Internal reliability coefficients were calculated. Responsiveness was assessed using paired t tests, effect size, and Guyatt's statistic for type 1 patients who completed psychoeducation.

RESULTS

Principal component and factor analyses identified a general factor but no consistent common factors. Internal consistency of the SCI-R was alpha = 0.87. Correlation with a measure of frequency of diabetes self-care behaviors was r = 0.63, providing evidence for SCI-R concurrent validity. The SCI-R correlated with diabetes-related distress (r = -0.36), self-esteem (r = 0.25), self-efficacy (r = 0.47), depression (r = -0.22), anxiety (r = -0.24), and HbA(1c) (r = -0.37), supporting construct validity. Responsiveness analyses showed SCI-R scores improved with diabetes psychoeducation with a medium effect size of 0.62 and a Guyatt's statistic of 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCI-R is a brief, psychometrically sound measure of perceptions of adherence to recommended diabetes self-care behaviors of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

在成年糖尿病患者中检验自我护理量表修订版(SCI-R)的心理测量特性,该量表是一种用于评估对糖尿病自我护理建议的感知依从性的自评工具。

研究设计与方法

我们使用了三个成年1型和2型糖尿病患者数据集来检验SCI-R的心理测量特性。主成分分析和因子分析用于检验是否存在一个一般因子或共同因子。检验与理论相关概念的测量指标之间的关联,以评估SCI-R的同时效度和收敛效度。计算内部信度系数。对于完成心理教育的1型患者,使用配对t检验、效应量和盖亚特统计量评估反应度。

结果

主成分分析和因子分析确定了一个一般因子,但没有一致的共同因子。SCI-R的内部一致性为α = 0.87。与糖尿病自我护理行为频率测量指标的相关性为r = 0.63,为SCI-R的同时效度提供了证据。SCI-R与糖尿病相关困扰(r = -0.36)、自尊(r = 0.25)、自我效能感(r = 0.47)、抑郁(r = -0.22)、焦虑(r = -0.24)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(r = -0.37)相关,支持结构效度。反应度分析表明,糖尿病心理教育后SCI-R得分有所改善,效应量为中等的0.62,盖亚特统计量为0.85。

结论

SCI-R是一种简短的、心理测量学上合理的工具,用于评估1型或2型糖尿病成年患者对推荐的糖尿病自我护理行为的感知依从性。