Lindemann Charles B, Macauley Lisa J, Lesich Kathleen A
Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48309-4476, USA.
Biophys J. 2005 Aug;89(2):1165-74. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.060681. Epub 2005 May 27.
Rat sperm that have been rendered passive by disabling the dynein motors with 50 muM sodium metavanadate and 0.1 mM ATP exhibit an interesting response to imposed bending. When the proximal flagellum is bent with a microprobe, the portion of the flagellum distal to the probe contact point develops a bend in the direction opposite the imposed bend. This "counterbend" is not compatible with a simple elastic beam. It can be satisfactorily explained by the sliding tubule model of flagellar structure but only if there are permanent elastic connections between the outer doublets of the axoneme. The elastic component that contributes the bending torque for the counterbend does not reset to a new equilibrium position after an imposed bend but returns the flagellum to a nearly straight or slightly curved final position after release from the probe. This suggests it is based on fixed, rather than mobile, attachments. It is also disrupted by elastase or trypsin digestion, confirming that it is dependent on a protein linkage. Adopting the assumption that the elasticity is attributed to the nexin links that repeat at 96 nm intervals, we find an apparent elasticity for each link that ranges from 1.6 to 10 x 10(-5) N/m. However, the elasticity is nonlinear and does not follow Hooke's law but appears to decrease with increased stretch. In addition, the responsible elastic elements must be able to stretch to more than 10 times their resting length without breakage to account for the observed counterbend formation. Elasticity created by some type of protein unfolding may be the only viable explanation consistent with both the extreme capacity for extension and the nonlinear character of the restoring force that is observed.
用50μM偏钒酸钠和0.1 mM三磷酸腺苷使动力蛋白失活从而变得被动的大鼠精子,对施加的弯曲表现出有趣的反应。当用微探针弯曲近端鞭毛时,探针接触点远端的鞭毛部分会朝与施加弯曲相反的方向产生弯曲。这种“反向弯曲”不符合简单的弹性梁原理。它可以用鞭毛结构的滑动微管模型得到满意的解释,但前提是轴丝的外双联体之间存在永久的弹性连接。为反向弯曲提供弯曲扭矩的弹性成分在施加弯曲后不会重置到新的平衡位置,而是在从探针释放后使鞭毛回到几乎笔直或略有弯曲的最终位置。这表明它是基于固定而非可移动的连接。它也会被弹性蛋白酶或胰蛋白酶消化破坏,这证实它依赖于蛋白质连接。假设弹性归因于以96纳米间隔重复的连接蛋白连接,我们发现每个连接的表观弹性范围为1.6至10×10⁻⁵牛/米。然而,这种弹性是非线性的,不遵循胡克定律,而是似乎随着拉伸增加而减小。此外,起作用的弹性元件必须能够拉伸到其静止长度的10倍以上而不破裂,以解释观察到的反向弯曲形成。由某种蛋白质展开产生的弹性可能是与观察到的延伸的极端能力和恢复力的非线性特征都一致的唯一可行解释。