• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年医学管理与临床研究中的微妙伦理困境。

Subtle ethical dilemmas in geriatric management and clinical research.

作者信息

Rosin A J, van Dijk Y

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2005 Jun;31(6):355-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008532.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2004.008532
PMID:15923486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1734158/
Abstract

Routine management of geriatric problems often raises ethical problems, particularly regarding autonomy of the old person. The carers or children may be unaware of the sensitivity of role reversal in dealing with the financial affairs; the need for a residential carer may compromise the old person's privacy. Attending a day centre confers much benefit, but one must understand the old person's resistance to change in the proposal of a new daily regimen. Similarly his or her autonomy must be the priority in planning for admittance to an old age home, and not the assumption that the family knows best. A common dilemma is the assessment of an old person's competency in decision making, either about management of his affairs, or regarding consent to treatment, or participation in research. Because cognitive capacity is not always identical with competency, meaningful tools have recently been developed in which the emphasis is on the specific situation to be investigated.

摘要

老年问题的常规管理常常引发伦理问题,尤其是在老年人的自主权方面。护理人员或子女可能没有意识到在处理财务事务时角色逆转的敏感性;对住家护理人员的需求可能会损害老年人的隐私。参加日间护理中心有诸多益处,但必须理解老年人对新日常安排提议的抵触情绪。同样,在规划入住养老院时,其自主权必须是首要考虑因素,而不是假定家庭最了解情况。一个常见的困境是评估老年人在决策方面的能力,无论是关于其事务的管理、治疗同意还是参与研究。由于认知能力并不总是等同于决策能力,最近已经开发出了有意义的工具,这些工具强调要针对具体情况进行调查。

相似文献

1
Subtle ethical dilemmas in geriatric management and clinical research.老年医学管理与临床研究中的微妙伦理困境。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jun;31(6):355-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008532.
2
Ethical problems in geriatrics: views of Turkish primary healthcare professionals.老年医学中的伦理问题:土耳其初级保健专业人员的观点。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013 Oct;13(4):1059-68. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12019. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
Ethical considerations in geriatric neuropsychology.老年神经心理学中的伦理考量
NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(5):447-54.
5
Ethical and legal issues in nursing home care.养老院护理中的伦理和法律问题。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 12;156(3):249-56.
6
Ethical dilemmas in community mental health care.社区精神卫生保健中的伦理困境。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):452-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006999.
7
Informed consent in the elderly: assessing decisional capacity.老年人的知情同意:评估决策能力。
Semin Perioper Nurs. 1997 Jan;6(1):59-64.
8
Ethical and legal issues in special patient care.特殊患者护理中的伦理和法律问题。
Dent Clin North Am. 1994 Jul;38(3):553-75.
9
Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision-making: a call for reasonableness in deciding for others.患者自主性、能力评估和代理人决策:代他人做决定时的合理性诉求。
Bioethics. 2010 Feb;24(2):87-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00672.x. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
10
Self-determination and elder abuse do we know enough?自我决定权与虐待老年人:我们了解得够多了吗?
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2006;46(3-4):81-102. doi: 10.1300/J083v46n03_05.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimising Medication Use along Dementia Progression: Recommendations from a Qualitative Study.优化痴呆症进展过程中的药物使用:一项定性研究的建议
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 2;9(8):982. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9080982.
2
Geriatric Basics for the Neurohospitalist.神经科住院医师的老年医学基础
Neurohospitalist. 2018 Apr;8(2):92-101. doi: 10.1177/1941874417738697. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
3
Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.老年人群体的口腔保健和研究中的知情同意:系统评价。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Apr;148(4):211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.11.019. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Alzheimer's disease patients' and caregivers' capacity, competency, and reasons to enroll in an early-phase Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.阿尔茨海默病患者及其照护者参与早期阿尔茨海默病临床试验的能力、资格及原因。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Dec;50(12):2019-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50615.x.
2
Relationship between Alzheimer's disease severity and patient participation in decisions about their medical care.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2002 Summer;15(2):68-72. doi: 10.1177/089198870201500203.
3
Addressing the ethical challenges of clinical trials that involve patients with dementia.应对涉及痴呆症患者的临床试验的伦理挑战。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2001 Winter;14(4):222-8. doi: 10.1177/089198870101400407.
4
Information and competency for consent to pharmacologic clinical trials in Alzheimer disease: an empirical analysis in patients and family caregivers.阿尔茨海默病药物临床试验知情同意的信息与能力:对患者及家庭护理人员的实证分析
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001 Jul-Sep;15(3):146-54. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200107000-00006.
5
Views of the person with dementia.痴呆症患者的观点。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27(2):86-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.2.86.
6
Competence of depressed patients for consent to research.抑郁症患者的研究同意能力。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;156(9):1380-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.9.1380.
7
Alzheimer's Disease International and International Working Group for Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines for research involving human subjects with dementia.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999 Apr-Jun;13(2):71-9. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199904000-00003.
8
At the coalface--medical ethics in practice. First, do no harm.在实际工作中——医学伦理学实践。首先,不伤害。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):377-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.377.
9
Experienced consent in geriatrics research: a new method to optimize the capacity to consent in frail elderly subjects.老年医学研究中的经验性同意:一种优化体弱老年受试者同意能力的新方法。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):271-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.271.
10
Aging, research and families.衰老、研究与家庭。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):267-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.267.