• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《健康保险流通与责任法案》时代基于实践的研究网络研究

Practice-based research network studies in the age of HIPAA.

作者信息

Pace Wilson D, Staton Elizabeth W, Holcomb Sherry

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38-45. doi: 10.1370/afm.301.

DOI:10.1370/afm.301
PMID:15928217
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1466957/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We wanted to explore potential effects of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) on research activities of practice-based research networks (PBRNs).

METHODS

To understand the approaches PBRNs are using to advance their research while adhering to HIPAA standards, we combined a literature review, our experiences, and discussions with local HIPAA officers, PBRN researchers in the United States, and individuals involved in drafting HIPAA.

RESULTS

HIPAA requires researchers to pay special attention to how they handle patients' protected health information (PHI). For researchers working within PBRNs, which collect information from patients and health care professionals in multiple institutions, the HIPAA Privacy Rule presents additional challenges. PBRN researchers can obtain patient authorization to use PHI, but this process is difficult and may taint the findings of some research studies. Some institutions may allow patients to provide a blanket authorization for study recruitment. PBRNs additionally can collect only "de-identified" data (data with identifying information removed) or, with a data use agreement, can work with a limited data set. PBRNs that blend quality improvement and research can work with PHI, but the researcher and practices must enter into a business agreement. PBRN researchers may need to play active, educational roles in institutional privacy boards to facilitate their research.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a number of ways for PBRN researchers to comply with HIPAA short of obtaining patient consent and authorization for every study. Careful planning and consideration of HIPAA issues during study design can go a long way toward reducing frustration later.

摘要

目的

我们希望探讨《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)对基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)研究活动的潜在影响。

方法

为了解PBRN在遵守HIPAA标准的同时推进其研究的方法,我们结合了文献综述、自身经验,并与当地HIPAA官员、美国的PBRN研究人员以及参与起草HIPAA的人员进行了讨论。

结果

HIPAA要求研究人员特别注意他们处理患者受保护健康信息(PHI)的方式。对于在PBRN内工作的研究人员而言,PBRN从多个机构的患者和医疗保健专业人员那里收集信息,HIPAA隐私规则带来了额外的挑战。PBRN研究人员可以获得患者使用PHI的授权,但这个过程很困难,而且可能会影响一些研究的结果。一些机构可能允许患者为研究招募提供全面授权。PBRN还可以只收集“去识别化”数据(去除识别信息的数据),或者通过数据使用协议,使用有限数据集。将质量改进与研究相结合的PBRN可以使用PHI,但研究人员和医疗机构必须签订商业协议。PBRN研究人员可能需要在机构隐私委员会中发挥积极的教育作用,以促进他们的研究。

结论

PBRN研究人员有多种方法可以在不获得每项研究的患者同意和授权的情况下遵守HIPAA。在研究设计过程中仔细规划和考虑HIPAA问题,对于减少后期的挫折感大有帮助。

相似文献

1
Practice-based research network studies in the age of HIPAA.《健康保险流通与责任法案》时代基于实践的研究网络研究
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38-45. doi: 10.1370/afm.301.
2
Complying with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Privacy standards.遵守《健康保险流通与责任法案》。隐私标准。
AAOHN J. 2001 Nov;49(11):501-7.
3
Roadmap to HIPAA: keeping occupational health nurses on track.《健康保险流通与责任法案》指南:让职业健康护士步入正轨
AAOHN J. 2004 Apr;52(4):169-77; quiz 178-9.
4
Informed consent for research and authorization under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: an integrated approach.研究知情同意与《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则下的授权:一种综合方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 2;144(9):685-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-9-200605020-00012.
5
The HIPAA privacy rule: practical advice for academic and research institutions.《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则:给学术和研究机构的实用建议。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2002 Feb;56(2):50-4.
6
Responsible conduct of radiology research. Part V. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and research.放射学研究的责任行为。第五部分。《健康保险流通与责任法案》与研究。
Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):757-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373041148.
7
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy rule: implications for clinical research.1996年《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)隐私规则:对临床研究的影响
Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:575-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131257.
8
HIPAA privacy rule and public health. Guidance from CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则与公共卫生。美国疾病控制与预防中心及美国卫生与公众服务部提供的指南。
MMWR Suppl. 2003 May 2;52:1-17, 19-20.
9
Reframing the influence of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act on research.重新构建《健康保险携带和责任法案》对研究的影响。
Chest. 2012 Mar;141(3):782-786. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2182.
10
Important Considerations for the Institutional Review Board When Granting Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Authorization Waivers.机构审查委员会在批准《健康保险流通与责任法案》授权豁免时的重要考量因素。
Ochsner J. 2020 Spring;20(1):95-97. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0083.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care (IBH-PC) to improve patient-centered outcomes in adults with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized control trial.将行为健康与初级保健相结合(IBH-PC)以改善患有多种慢性躯体疾病和行为健康状况的成年人的以患者为中心的结局:一项实用的整群随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05133-8.
2
Private collection: high correlation of sample collection and patient admission date in clinical microbiological testing complicates sharing of phylodynamic metadata.私人收藏:临床微生物检测中样本采集与患者入院日期的高度相关性使系统发育动力学元数据的共享变得复杂。
Virus Evol. 2018 Feb 27;4(1):vey005. doi: 10.1093/ve/vey005. eCollection 2018 Jan.
3
Lessons learned in the growth and maturation stages of a community pharmacy practice-based research network: Experiences of the Medication Safety Research Network of Indiana (Rx-SafeNet).社区药房实践型研究网络成长与成熟阶段的经验教训:印第安纳州药物安全研究网络(Rx-SafeNet)的经验
Innov Pharm. 2015;6(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v6i2.385.
4
Practice-based research networks, part I: clinical laboratories to generate and translate research findings into effective patient care.基于实践的研究网络,第一部分:临床实验室将研究结果转化为有效的患者护理。
J Athl Train. 2012 Sep-Oct;47(5):549-56. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.5.11.
5
Attribute Utility Motivated k-anonymization of datasets to support the heterogeneous needs of biomedical researchers.用于支持生物医学研究人员异构需求的数据集属性效用驱动的k匿名化。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1573-82. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
6
Data quality and fitness for purpose of routinely collected data--a general practice case study from an electronic practice-based research network (ePBRN).常规收集数据的数据质量及适用性——基于电子实践研究网络(ePBRN)的一项全科医疗案例研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:785-94. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
7
A novel protocol for streamlined IRB review of Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) card studies.一种简化实践研究网络(PBRN)卡片研究机构审查委员会审查的新方案。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;24(5):605-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110034.
8
Card studies for observational research in practice.临床实践中的观察性研究的病例研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):63-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1199.
9
Research subject enrollment by primary care pediatricians using an electronic health record.基层医疗儿科医生通过电子健康记录进行研究对象招募。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;2007:289-93.
10
Infrastructure requirements for practice-based research networks.基于实践的研究网络的基础设施要求。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5-11. doi: 10.1370/afm.299.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic data collection options for practice-based research networks.基于实践的研究网络的电子数据收集选项。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.270.
2
Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement.基于基层医疗实践的研究网络:在研究与质量改进之间的交叉领域开展工作。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.303.
3
On the nature and analysis of clustered data.关于聚类数据的性质与分析
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May-Jun;2(3):199-200. doi: 10.1370/afm.197.
4
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: a practical guide for researchers.《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则:研究人员实用指南
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4):321-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000119578.94846.f2.
5
Registry research and medical privacy.注册研究与医疗隐私。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 1;350(14):1452-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048027.
6
Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network.加拿大卒中网络登记处中知情同意的不可行性。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 1;350(14):1414-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa031697.
7
Final HIPAA security regulations: a review.《健康保险流通与责任法案》最终安全法规:综述
Manag Care Q. 2003 Summer;11(3):15-27.
8
The new HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) Medical Privacy Rule: help or hindrance for clinical research?新的《健康保险流通与责任法案》(1996年)医疗隐私规则:对临床研究是助力还是阻碍?
Circulation. 2003 Aug 26;108(8):912-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080642.35380.50.
9
Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.一项多中心遗传流行病学研究在当地机构审查中存在的问题性差异。
JAMA. 2003 Jul 16;290(3):360-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.3.360.
10
Diabetes management in the primary care setting: summary.基层医疗环境中的糖尿病管理:总结
Am J Med. 2002 Oct 28;113 Suppl 6A:36S-40S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01279-2.