Suppr超能文献

复杂性哀伤的治疗:一项随机对照试验。

Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Shear Katherine, Frank Ellen, Houck Patricia R, Reynolds Charles F

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa 15213, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2601-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2601.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Complicated grief is a debilitating disorder associated with important negative health consequences, but the results of existing treatments for it have been disappointing.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a novel approach, complicated grief treatment, with a standard psychotherapy (interpersonal psychotherapy).

DESIGN

Two-cell, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, stratified by manner of death of loved one and treatment site.

SETTING

A university-based psychiatric research clinic as well as a satellite clinic in a low-income African American community between April 2001 and April 2004.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 83 women and 12 men aged 18 to 85 years recruited through professional referral, self-referral, and media announcements who met criteria for complicated grief.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 46) or complicated grief treatment (n = 49); both were administered in 16 sessions during an average interval of 19 weeks per participant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Treatment response, defined either as independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Improvement score of 1 or 2 or as time to a 20-point or better improvement in the self-reported Inventory of Complicated Grief.

RESULTS

Both treatments produced improvement in complicated grief symptoms. The response rate was greater for complicated grief treatment (51%) than for interpersonal psychotherapy (28%; P = .02) and time to response was faster for complicated grief treatment (P = .02). The number needed to treat was 4.3.

CONCLUSION

Complicated grief treatment is an improved treatment over interpersonal psychotherapy, showing higher response rates and faster time to response.

摘要

背景

复杂性悲伤是一种使人衰弱的疾病,会带来严重的负面健康后果,但现有针对它的治疗效果一直令人失望。

目的

比较一种新方法——复杂性悲伤治疗,与标准心理治疗(人际心理治疗)的疗效。

设计

双组、前瞻性、随机对照临床试验,按所爱之人的死亡方式和治疗地点分层。

地点

2001年4月至2004年4月期间,一家大学附属精神科研究诊所及一个低收入非裔美国社区的卫星诊所。

参与者

通过专业推荐、自我推荐和媒体公告招募的83名女性和12名男性,年龄在18至85岁之间,符合复杂性悲伤标准。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配接受人际心理治疗(n = 46)或复杂性悲伤治疗(n = 49);两者均在16次治疗中进行,每位参与者平均间隔19周。

主要结局指标

治疗反应,定义为独立评估者评定的临床总体改善评分为1或2,或自我报告的复杂性悲伤量表改善20分或更多所需时间。

结果

两种治疗均使复杂性悲伤症状有所改善。复杂性悲伤治疗的反应率(51%)高于人际心理治疗(28%;P = .02),且复杂性悲伤治疗的反应时间更快(P = .02)。治疗所需人数为4.3。

结论

与人际心理治疗相比,复杂性悲伤治疗是一种更优的治疗方法,显示出更高的反应率和更快的反应时间。

相似文献

3
Is grief a disease? Sometimes.悲伤是一种疾病吗?有时是。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2658-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2658.
7
Complicated grief therapy as a new treatment approach.复杂性哀伤治疗作为一种新的治疗方法。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jun;14(2):159-66. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.2/jwetherell.
10
Interpersonal predictors of group therapy outcome for complicated grief.
Int J Group Psychother. 2002 Oct;52(4):511-35. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.52.4.511.45520.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
4
Does grief counseling work?哀伤辅导有效吗?
Death Stud. 2003 Nov;27(9):765-86. doi: 10.1080/713842360.
5
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
10
Traumatic grief treatment: a pilot study.
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;158(9):1506-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1506.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验