• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲环境下中老年人的教育水平不平等与交通伤害死亡率

Education level inequalities and transportation injury mortality in the middle aged and elderly in European settings.

作者信息

Borrell C, Plasència A, Huisman M, Costa G, Kunst A, Andersen O, Bopp M, Borgan J-K, Deboosere P, Glickman M, Gadeyne S, Minder C, Regidor E, Spadea T, Valkonen T, Mackenbach J P

机构信息

Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):138-42. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006346.

DOI:10.1136/ip.2004.006346
PMID:15933403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1730212/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the differential distribution of transportation injury mortality by educational level in nine European settings, among people older than 30 years, during the 1990s.

METHODS

Deaths of men and women older than 30 years from transportation injuries were studied. Rate differences and rate ratios (RR) between high and low educational level rates were obtained.

RESULTS

Among men, those of low educational level had higher death rates in all settings, a pattern that was maintained in the different settings; no inequalities were found among women. Among men, in all the settings, the RR was higher in the 30-49 age group (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.61) than in the age groups 50-69 and > or = 70 years, a pattern that was maintained in the different settings. For women for all the settings together, no differences were found among educational levels in the three age groups. In the different settings, only three had a high RR in the youngest age group, Finland (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.74), Belgium (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.67), and Austria (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.96).

CONCLUSION

This study provides new evidence on the importance of socioeconomic inequalities in transportation injury mortality across Europe. This applies to men, but not to women. Greater attention should be placed on opportunities to select intervention strategies tailored to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in transportation injuries.

摘要

目的

研究20世纪90年代欧洲九个地区30岁以上人群中交通伤死亡率按教育水平的差异分布。

方法

对30岁以上因交通伤死亡的男性和女性进行研究。得出高教育水平率与低教育水平率之间的率差和率比(RR)。

结果

在男性中,低教育水平者在所有地区的死亡率都较高,这种模式在不同地区都存在;女性中未发现不平等现象。在男性中,在所有地区,30 - 49岁年龄组的RR(RR 1.46,95%置信区间1.32至1.61)高于50 - 69岁和≥70岁年龄组,这种模式在不同地区都存在。对于所有地区的女性而言,三个年龄组的教育水平之间未发现差异。在不同地区,只有三个地区在最年轻年龄组的RR较高,即芬兰(RR 1.33,95%置信区间1.01至1.74)、比利时(RR 1.38;95%置信区间1.13至1.67)和奥地利(RR 1.49,95%置信区间0.75至2.96)。

结论

本研究为欧洲交通伤死亡率方面社会经济不平等的重要性提供了新证据。这适用于男性,但不适用于女性。应更加关注选择针对解决交通伤方面社会经济不平等问题的干预策略的机会。

相似文献

1
Education level inequalities and transportation injury mortality in the middle aged and elderly in European settings.欧洲环境下中老年人的教育水平不平等与交通伤害死亡率
Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):138-42. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006346.
2
Trends in socioeconomic mortality inequalities in a southern European urban setting at the turn of the 21st century.21世纪之交南欧城市地区社会经济死亡率不平等的趋势。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Mar;62(3):258-66. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.057166.
3
Individual and contextual effects in injury morbidity in Barcelona (Spain).西班牙巴塞罗那伤害发病率中的个体和环境影响
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.05.005.
4
Socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in 16 European populations.16个欧洲人群肺癌死亡率的社会经济不平等现象。
Lung Cancer. 2009 Mar;63(3):322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
5
Social inequalities and cancer mortality in France, 1975-1990.1975 - 1990年法国的社会不平等与癌症死亡率
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Jun;16(5):501-13. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-7114-2.
6
[Changing social disparities and mortality in France (1968-1996): cause of death analysis by educational level].[法国社会不平等与死亡率的变化(1968 - 1996年):按教育水平进行的死因分析]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Apr;55(2):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2006.10.001.
7
The contribution of causes of death to socioeconomic inequalities in child mortality: New Zealand 1981-1999.儿童死亡率的社会经济不平等中死因的作用:新西兰1981 - 1999年
N Z Med J. 2005 Dec 16;118(1227):U1779.
8
Ethnic inequalities in age- and cause-specific mortality in The Netherlands.荷兰按年龄和死因划分的死亡率中的种族不平等现象。
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;33(5):1112-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh189. Epub 2004 May 27.
9
A nationwide cohort study of educational background and major causes of death among the elderly population in Japan.一项关于日本老年人口教育背景与主要死因的全国性队列研究。
Prev Med. 2005 Apr;40(4):444-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.002.
10
Heterogeneity by age in educational inequalities in cause-specific mortality in women in the Region of Madrid.马德里地区女性特定死因死亡率的教育不平等的年龄差异。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Oct;63(10):832-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.080986. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Profile and risk factors in farmer injuries: a review based on Haddon matrix and 5 E's risk reduction strategy.农民伤害的特征和危险因素:基于 Haddon 矩阵和 5E 减少风险策略的综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;12:1322884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1322884. eCollection 2024.
2
Inequalities in External-Cause Mortality in 2018 across Industries in Republic of Korea.2018年韩国各行业外因死亡率的不平等情况。
Saf Health Work. 2022 Mar;13(1):117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
3
Assessing Factors Associated with Non-Fatal Injuries from Road Traffic Accidents among Malaysian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the PURE Malaysia Study.评估马来西亚成年人道路交通伤害非致命性损伤的相关因素:基于 PURE 马来西亚研究的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 6;19(14):8246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148246.
4
Analysis of the regional distribution of road traffic mortality and associated factors in Japan.日本道路交通死亡率的区域分布及相关因素分析。
Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 28;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00356-4.
5
Socio-Demographic Determinants of Road Traffic Fatalities in Women of Reproductive Age in the Republic of Georgia: Evidence from the National Reproductive Age Mortality Study (2014).格鲁吉亚共和国育龄女性道路交通死亡的社会人口学决定因素:来自全国育龄期死亡率研究(2014年)的证据
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Jul 13;12:527-537. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S244437. eCollection 2020.
6
Safe mobility, socioeconomic inequalities, and aging: A 12-year multilevel interrupted time-series analysis of road traffic death rates in a Latin American country.安全出行、社会经济不平等与老龄化:对拉丁美洲一国 12 年道路交通事故死亡率的多层次中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 7;15(1):e0224545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224545. eCollection 2020.
7
Does spending matters? Re-looking into various covariates associated with Out of Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) and catastrophic spending on accidental injury from NSSO 71st round data.支出重要吗?基于第71轮全国抽样调查数据重新审视与意外伤害的自付费用(OOPE)和灾难性支出相关的各种协变量。
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0177-z.
8
Neighborhood Influences on Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Severity.社区对行人和车辆碰撞严重程度的影响。
J Urban Health. 2017 Dec;94(6):855-868. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0200-z.
9
Mortality rates by occupation in Korea: a nationwide, 13-year follow-up study.韩国按职业划分的死亡率:一项全国性的13年随访研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2016 May;73(5):329-35. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103192. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Educational inequalities in mortality by cause of death: first national data for the Netherlands.按死因划分的死亡率方面的教育不平等:荷兰的首批全国数据。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Oct;59(5):687-96. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0576-4. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality among elderly people in 11 European populations.11个欧洲人群中老年人死亡率的社会经济不平等现象。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jun;58(6):468-75. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.010496.
2
Educational level and stroke mortality: a comparison of 10 European populations during the 1990s.教育水平与卒中死亡率:20世纪90年代10个欧洲人群的比较
Stroke. 2004 Feb;35(2):432-7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000109225.11509.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 15.
3
Inequality and road-traffic injuries: call for action.不平等与道路交通伤害:呼吁采取行动。
Lancet. 2003 Dec 20;362(9401):2034-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15145-8.
4
Preface: the role of the epidemiologist in injury prevention and control--an unmet challenge.
Epidemiol Rev. 2003;25:1-2. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxg008.
5
Overall injury risk to different drivers: combining exposure, frequency, and severity models.不同驾驶员的总体受伤风险:结合暴露、频率和严重程度模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Jul;35(4):441-50. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00021-0.
6
Role of individual and contextual effects in injury mortality: new evidence from small area analysis.个体和环境因素在伤害死亡率中的作用:来自小区域分析的新证据。
Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.297.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in injury: critical issues in design and analysis.伤害方面的社会经济不平等:设计与分析中的关键问题。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:349-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140548. Epub 2001 Oct 25.
8
Socioeconomic differences in road traffic injuries during childhood and youth: a closer look at different kinds of road user.儿童和青少年时期道路交通伤害的社会经济差异:深入研究不同类型的道路使用者。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Dec;55(12):858-62. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.12.858.
9
Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in road traffic injuries: time for a policy agenda.减少道路交通伤害方面的社会经济不平等:制定政策议程的时候到了。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Dec;55(12):853-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.12.853.
10
Sex, gender, and health: the need for a new approach.性别、性与健康:采用新方法的必要性。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 3;323(7320):1061-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1061.