Outlaw F H, Lowery B J
University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia 19104-6096.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1992 Apr;30(4):13-7. doi: 10.3928/0279-3695-19920401-07.
The research to date shows that there is not much data to guide nursing decisions about the use of seclusion. The justification for its use is not always as clear as one might hope. Although many patients are secluded for violence against themselves or others, there are others who have not been violent who are secluded. There may be justification for secluding violent patients, but, as indicated earlier, it may reinforce the behavior it is designed to stop. There probably is no justification for secluding patients who make loud noises, refuse to take medication, or refuse to participate in activities. In addition, it is disconcerting that a large percentage of patients are secluded for "escalating agitation," that is, they have not acted violently against themselves or others. What is problematic is that staff are undoubtedly predicting violent behaviors in these patients--predictions that might be erroneous. Thus, there is ample room for injustice to occur. The potential for injustice is even greater if certain patients are singled out for seclusion or if patients are secluded longer than they or the staff think that they need to be, as is indicated in some of the studies to date. Moreover, if unit variables are associated with seclusion activity, this too, may be indicative of decision making at certain times of the day or by certain staff members that may not be in the best interest of the patient. What seems fairly clear is that secluding a patient is a distressing event for staff and is viewed extremely negatively by some patients and as a reward by others.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
迄今为止的研究表明,几乎没有数据可用于指导关于使用隔离措施的护理决策。其使用的理由并不总是像人们希望的那样清晰。尽管许多患者因对自己或他人实施暴力而被隔离,但也有一些未曾实施暴力的患者被隔离。隔离暴力患者或许有其合理性,但如前所述,这可能会强化其旨在制止的行为。对于那些大声喧哗、拒绝服药或拒绝参加活动的患者,进行隔离可能毫无道理。此外,很大一部分患者因“情绪升级”而被隔离,即他们并未对自己或他人实施暴力,这令人不安。问题在于,工作人员无疑是在预测这些患者的暴力行为——而这些预测可能是错误的。因此,存在大量不公正发生的空间。如果某些患者被挑出来进行隔离,或者患者被隔离的时间超过他们自己或工作人员认为所需的时间,不公正的可能性就更大,正如迄今为止一些研究所表明的那样。此外,如果病房变量与隔离活动相关,这也可能表明在一天中的某些时候或某些工作人员做出的决策可能不符合患者的最大利益。相当清楚的是,隔离患者对工作人员来说是一件令人痛苦的事情,并且一些患者对此极为反感,而另一些患者则将其视为一种奖励。(摘要截选于250字)