Suppr超能文献

热格栅的定性和定量表征。

Qualitative and quantitative characterization of the thermal grill.

作者信息

Leung Albert Y, Wallace Mark S, Schulteis Gery, Yaksh Tony L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0924, La Jolla, CA 92093-0924, USA.

出版信息

Pain. 2005 Jul;116(1-2):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.026.

Abstract

Concurrent applications to the skin of spatially adjacent bands of innocuous warm and cool stimuli would elicit a peculiar sensation, known as the 'thermal grill illusion'. To validate the thermal grill as a research tool, this two-phase study qualitatively characterizes this peculiar sensation and further quantitatively establishes the temperature matching of the most intense/noxious thermal grill stimulations at two different time points. The temperature combinations (degrees C) tested were: 18/18, 42/42, 18/42, 20/20, 40/40, 20/40, 22/22, 38/38, 22/38, 24/24, 36/36 and 24/36. None of the subjects reported pain with single temperature combinations. However, hot associated with pain and burning sensations were reported in all mixed temperature combinations tested. The VAS scores for pain were significantly elevated for 20/40 and 18/42 in comparison to 22/38 and 24/36 (P<0.007). At the 3-second time point, the matching temperatures (+/-SD) of 20/40 and 18/42 were 45.7+/-1.8 (range 44-48) and 46.6+/-1.5 (range 44-48) degrees C, respectively, whereas the matching temperatures for the single temperature combinations were similar to the set temperatures. Importantly, at the 10-second time point, none of the combinations were significantly greater than the highest of the pair of stimuli. The time course variation in the perception of the combined stimuli suggests an adaptation occurred in central processing.

摘要

同时对皮肤施加空间相邻的无害温暖和凉爽刺激带会引发一种特殊的感觉,即“热格栅错觉”。为了验证热格栅作为一种研究工具,这项两阶段研究定性地描述了这种特殊感觉,并进一步定量确定了在两个不同时间点最强烈/有害的热格栅刺激的温度匹配。测试的温度组合(摄氏度)为:18/18、42/42、18/42、20/20、40/40、20/40、22/22、38/38、22/38、24/24、36/36和24/36。没有受试者报告单一温度组合会引起疼痛。然而,在所有测试的混合温度组合中都报告了与疼痛和灼烧感相关的热感。与22/38和24/36相比,20/40和18/42的疼痛视觉模拟评分显著升高(P<0.007)。在3秒时间点,20/40和18/42的匹配温度(±标准差)分别为45.7±1.8(范围44 - 48)和46.6±1.5(范围44 - 48)摄氏度,而单一温度组合的匹配温度与设定温度相似。重要的是,在10秒时间点,没有任何组合显著高于一对刺激中的最高温度。联合刺激感知的时间进程变化表明在中枢处理中发生了适应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验