Suppr超能文献

初级保健医生对体罚的态度。

Attitudes of primary care physicians toward corporal punishment.

作者信息

McCormick K F

机构信息

Barberton Citizen's Hospital, Family Practice Residency, OH 44203.

出版信息

JAMA. 1992 Jun 17;267(23):3161-5.

PMID:1593736
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not family physicians and pediatricians support the use of corporal punishment. The frequency with which these physicians offer anticipatory guidance on discipline was also studied.

DESIGN

Self-report survey, mailed to study participants.

PARTICIPANTS

The sample for this study was 800 family physicians and 400 pediatricians, randomly selected from the Ohio State Medical Board's roster of family physicians and pediatricians. Physicians with a subspecialty were excluded. Participants who did not return their surveys received a second, and if necessary, a third mailing of the survey. After three mailings, a total of 619 physicians (61%) completed a survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Participants were considered to support corporal punishment if they would tell a parent in their medical practice that spanking would be an appropriate response to any one of a series of childhood misbehaviors presented in the survey.

RESULTS

Of family physicians, 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66% to 75%) support use of corporal punishment. Of pediatricians, 59% (95% CI, 52% to 66%) support corporal punishment. Of pediatricians, 90% (95% CI, 86% to 94%) indicated that they include discipline issues either always or most of the time when providing anticipatory guidance to parents. Significantly fewer family physicians (52%; 95% CI, 47% to 57%) indicated that they discuss discipline either always or most of the time when providing anticipatory guidance (P less than .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Most family physicians and pediatricians support the use of corporal punishment in spite of evidence that it is neither effective nor necessary, and can be harmful. Pediatricians offer anticipatory guidance on discipline more often than family physicians.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定家庭医生和儿科医生是否支持使用体罚。同时也研究了这些医生提供有关纪律方面预期指导的频率。

设计

向研究参与者邮寄自我报告调查问卷。

参与者

本研究样本为800名家庭医生和400名儿科医生,从俄亥俄州医学委员会的家庭医生和儿科医生名册中随机选取。排除有亚专业的医生。未回复调查问卷的参与者会收到第二次,如有必要还会收到第三次邮寄的调查问卷。经过三次邮寄后,共有619名医生(61%)完成了调查。

主要观察指标

如果参与者会在医疗实践中告知家长,打屁股是对调查问卷中列出的一系列儿童不当行为中任何一种的适当回应,那么他们就被视为支持体罚。

结果

70%(95%置信区间[CI],66%至75%)的家庭医生支持使用体罚。59%(95%CI,52%至66%)的儿科医生支持体罚。90%(95%CI,86%至94%)的儿科医生表示,他们在为家长提供预期指导时,总是或大部分时间会涉及纪律问题。显著较少的家庭医生(52%;95%CI,47%至57%)表示,他们在提供预期指导时总是或大部分时间会讨论纪律问题(P小于0.01)。

结论

尽管有证据表明体罚既无效也无必要,而且可能有害,但大多数家庭医生和儿科医生仍支持使用体罚。儿科医生比家庭医生更频繁地提供有关纪律方面的预期指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验