Collins Michael T, Wells Scott J, Petrini Kristine R, Collins James E, Schultz Ronald D, Whitlock Robert H
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2015 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1102, USA.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Jun;12(6):685-92. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.6.685-692.2005.
Five diagnostic tests based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technology for bovine paratuberculosis were evaluated by using individual serum or milk samples from 359 dairy cattle in seven paratuberculosis-free herds and 2,094 dairy cattle in seven Mycobacterium paratuberculosis-infected dairy herds. Three independent laboratories using three different culture procedures completed fecal cultures for M. paratuberculosis on these cattle and found 417 cows to be shedding M. paratuberculosis in their feces. An animal that was fecal culture positive for M. paratuberculosis by any of the three laboratories was considered a confirmed case of infection. The specificity of three ELISAs (two on serum and one on milk) was > or =99.8%. The specificity of the remaining two ELISAs, both done on serum, was 94.9 and 84.7%. Four of the five ELISAs evaluated produced similar sensitivity in detecting fecal culture-positive cattle (27.8 to 28.9%). Serum ELISA "D" had the lowest specificity (84.7%) and the highest sensitivity (44.5%), but if the cutoff value defining a positive test was changed from 125 to 250% (of the positive control) the sensitivity and specificity, 31.8 and 97.5%, respectively, were comparable to those of the other four assays. If the case definition for M. paratuberculosis infection was based on the culture results of a single laboratory instead of the combined results of three laboratories, ELISA sensitivity estimates were 45.7 to 50.0%. With the exception of ELISA D, assay agreement was high (kappa 0.66 to 0.85) for categorical assay interpretations (positive or negative), but linear regression of quantitative results showed low correlation coefficients (r(2) = 0.40 to 0.68) due to the fact that ELISA results for some cows were high in one assay but low in another assay. Likelihood ratio analysis showed a direct relationship between the magnitude of ELISA result and the odds of a cow shedding M. paratuberculosis in its feces. If used judiciously and interpreted quantitatively, these ELISAs are useful tools in support of paratuberculosis control programs in dairy herds.
采用来自7个无副结核病牛群的359头奶牛以及7个感染副结核分枝杆菌的奶牛群的2094头奶牛的个体血清或乳样,对基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术的5种牛副结核病诊断检测方法进行了评估。3个独立实验室采用3种不同培养程序,对这些奶牛进行了副结核分枝杆菌粪便培养,发现417头奶牛粪便中排出副结核分枝杆菌。3个实验室中任何一个实验室粪便培养副结核分枝杆菌呈阳性的动物被视为确诊感染病例。3种ELISA检测方法(2种检测血清,1种检测乳样)的特异性≥99.8%。其余2种均检测血清的ELISA检测方法的特异性分别为94.9%和84.7%。所评估的5种ELISA检测方法中有4种在检测粪便培养阳性奶牛时具有相似的敏感性(27.8%至28.9%)。血清ELISA“D”的特异性最低(84.7%),敏感性最高(44.5%),但如果将定义阳性检测的临界值从(阳性对照的)125%改为250%,其敏感性和特异性分别为31.8%和97.5%,与其他4种检测方法相当。如果副结核分枝杆菌感染的病例定义基于单个实验室的培养结果而非3个实验室的综合结果,ELISA敏感性估计值为45.7%至50.0%。除ELISA D外,分类检测结果(阳性或阴性)的检测一致性较高(kappa值为0.66至0.85),但定量结果的线性回归显示相关系数较低(r² = 0.40至0.68),原因是一些奶牛的ELISA检测结果在一种检测方法中较高而在另一种检测方法中较低。似然比分析表明ELISA结果的大小与奶牛粪便中排出副结核分枝杆菌的几率之间存在直接关系。如果谨慎使用并进行定量解读,这些ELISA检测方法是支持奶牛群副结核病防控计划的有用工具。