Dienes Zoltán, Scott Ryan
Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Psychol Res. 2005 Jun;69(5-6):338-51. doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0208-3. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
This paper investigates the dissociation between conscious and unconscious knowledge in an implicit learning paradigm. Two experiments employing the artificial grammar learning task explored the acquisition of unconscious and conscious knowledge of structure (structural knowledge). Structural knowledge was contrasted to knowledge of whether an item has that structure (judgment knowledge). For both structural and judgment knowledge, conscious awareness was assessed using subjective measures. It was found that unconscious structural knowledge could lead to both conscious and unconscious judgment knowledge. When structural knowledge was unconscious, there was no tendency for judgment knowledge to become more conscious over time. Furthermore, conscious rather than unconscious structural knowledge produced more consistent errors in judgments, was facilitated by instructions to search for rules, and after such instructions was harmed by a secondary task. The dissociations validate the use of these subjective measures of conscious awareness.
本文在一种内隐学习范式中研究了意识性知识与非意识性知识之间的分离。两项采用人工语法学习任务的实验探究了对结构的非意识性知识和意识性知识(结构知识)的习得。结构知识与某一项目是否具有该结构的知识(判断知识)形成对比。对于结构知识和判断知识,均使用主观测量方法来评估意识觉知。研究发现,非意识性结构知识能够导致意识性和非意识性的判断知识。当结构知识是非意识性的时候,判断知识并不会随着时间的推移而变得更具意识性。此外,意识性而非非意识性的结构知识在判断中产生了更为一致的错误,在搜索规则的指令下得到促进,而在这类指令之后会受到一项次要任务的损害。这些分离验证了这些意识觉知主观测量方法的效用。