Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.009. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
A common view holds that consciousness is needed for knowledge acquired in one domain to be applied in a novel domain. We present evidence for the opposite; where the transfer of knowledge is achieved only in the absence of conscious awareness. Knowledge of artificial grammars was examined where training and testing occurred in different vocabularies or modalities. In all conditions grammaticality judgments attributed to random selection showed above-chance accuracy (60%), while those attributed to conscious decisions did not. Participants also rated each string's familiarity and performed a perceptual task assessing fluency. Familiarity was predicted by repetition structure and was thus related to grammaticality. Fluency, though increasing familiarity, was unrelated to grammaticality. While familiarity predicted all judgments only those attributed to random selection showed a significant additional contribution of grammaticality, deriving primarily from chunk novelty. In knowledge transfer, as in visual perception (Marcel, 1993), the unconscious may outperform the conscious.
一种常见的观点认为,在将一个领域获得的知识应用于新领域时,需要有意识。我们提供了相反的证据;在没有意识的情况下,知识的转移是可以实现的。在不同词汇或模态中进行训练和测试的情况下,对人工语法的知识进行了检查。在所有条件下,归因于随机选择的语法判断显示出高于机会的准确性(60%),而归因于有意识决策的判断则没有。参与者还对每个字符串的熟悉度进行了评分,并进行了一项评估流畅度的感知任务。熟悉度由重复结构预测,因此与语法有关。流畅度虽然增加了熟悉度,但与语法无关。虽然熟悉度可以预测所有判断,但只有那些归因于随机选择的判断显示出语法的显著额外贡献,主要来自于组块的新颖性。在知识转移中,就像在视觉感知中(马塞尔,1993),无意识可能优于有意识。