Dienes Zoltán
Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Prog Brain Res. 2008;168:49-64. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)68005-4.
The chapter gives an overview of the use of subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Unconscious knowledge is knowledge we have, and could very well be using, but we are not aware of. Hence appropriate methods for indicating unconscious knowledge must show that the person (a) has knowledge but (b) does not know that she has it. One way of determining awareness of knowing is by taking confidence ratings after making judgments. If the judgments are above baseline but the person believes they are guessing (guessing criterion) or confidence does not relate to accuracy (zero-correlation criterion) there is evidence of unconscious knowledge. The way these methods can deal with the problem of bias is discussed, as is the use of different types of confidence scales. The guessing and zero-correlation criteria show whether or not the person is aware of knowing the content of the judgment, but not whether the person is aware of what any knowledge was that enabled the judgment. Thus, a distinction is made between judgment and structural knowledge, and it is shown how the conscious status of the latter can also be assessed. Finally, the use of control over the use of knowledge as a subjective measure of judgment knowledge is illustrated. Experiments using artificial grammar learning and a serial reaction time task explore these issues.
本章概述了无意识知识主观测量方法的应用。无意识知识是我们所拥有且很可能正在运用的知识,但我们并未意识到它的存在。因此,用于表明无意识知识的恰当方法必须证明,此人(a)拥有知识,但(b)并不知道自己拥有该知识。确定是否知晓的一种方法是在做出判断后进行信心评级。如果判断高于基线水平,但此人认为自己是在猜测(猜测标准),或者信心与准确性无关(零相关标准),那就存在无意识知识的证据。文中讨论了这些方法如何处理偏差问题,以及不同类型信心量表的使用情况。猜测和零相关标准表明此人是否意识到知晓判断的内容,但并未表明此人是否意识到促成该判断的知识是什么。因此,文中区分了判断和结构性知识,并展示了如何评估后者的意识状态。最后,说明了将对知识运用的控制用作判断知识主观测量方法的情况。使用人工语法学习和序列反应时任务的实验探讨了这些问题。