Hutcherson C A, Goldin P R, Ochsner K N, Gabrieli J D, Barrett L Feldman, Gross J J
Department of Psychology, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA.
Neuroimage. 2005 Sep;27(3):656-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028.
Functional neuroimaging of affective systems often includes subjective self-report of the affective response. Although self-report provides valuable information regarding participants' affective responses, prior studies have raised the concern that the attentional demands of reporting on affective experience may obscure neural activations reflecting more natural affective responses. In the present study, we used potent emotion-eliciting amusing and sad films, employed a novel method of continuous self-reported rating of emotion experience, and compared the impact of rating with passive viewing of amusing and sad films. Subjective rating of ongoing emotional responses did not decrease either self-reported experience of emotion or neural activations relative to passive viewing in any brain regions. Rating, relative to passive viewing, produced increased activity in anterior cingulate, insula, and several other areas associated with introspection of emotion. These results support the use of continuous emotion measures and emotionally engaging films to study the dynamics of emotional responding and suggest that there may be some contexts in which the attention to emotion induced by reporting emotion experience does not disrupt emotional responding either behaviorally or neurally.
情感系统的功能性神经成像通常包括对情感反应的主观自我报告。虽然自我报告提供了有关参与者情感反应的有价值信息,但先前的研究引发了这样的担忧,即报告情感体验的注意力需求可能会掩盖反映更自然情感反应的神经激活。在本研究中,我们使用了能有效引发情感的有趣和悲伤电影,采用了一种新颖的连续自我报告情感体验评分方法,并比较了评分与被动观看有趣和悲伤电影的影响。相对于被动观看,对正在进行的情感反应进行主观评分在任何脑区均未降低自我报告的情感体验或神经激活。相对于被动观看,评分在前扣带回、脑岛和其他几个与情感内省相关的区域产生了增强的活动。这些结果支持使用连续情感测量和情感投入的电影来研究情感反应的动态变化,并表明在某些情况下,报告情感体验所引发的对情感的关注在行为或神经层面上都不会干扰情感反应。