Van Gammeren Darin, Falk Darin J, DeRuisseau Keith C, Sellman Jeff E, Decramer Marc, Powers Scott K
Department of Applied Psychology, Center for Exercise Science, University of Florida, Room 25 FLG, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2204-10. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2204.
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used clinically to treat patients who are incapable of maintaining adequate alveolar ventilation. Prolonged MV is associated with diaphragmatic atrophy and a decrement in maximal specific force production (P(O)). Collectively, these alterations may predispose the diaphragm to injury on the return to spontaneous breathing (ie, reloading). Therefore, these experiments tested the hypothesis that reloading the diaphragm following MV exacerbates MV-induced diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction, while causing muscle fiber membrane damage and inflammation.
To test this postulate, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) control; (2) 24 h of controlled MV; and (3) 24 h of controlled MV followed by 2 h of anesthetized spontaneous breathing. Controls were anesthetized in the short term but were not exposed to MV, whereas MV animals were anesthetized, tracheostomized, and ventilated. Reloaded animals remained under anesthesia, but were removed from MV and returned to spontaneous breathing for 2 h.
Compared to the situation with control animals, MV resulted in a 26% decrement in diaphragmatic specific P(O) without muscle fiber membrane damage, as measured by an increase in membrane permeability (using the procion orange technique). Further, there were no increases in neutrophil or macrophage influx. Two hours of reloading did not exacerbate MV-induced diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction or cause fiber membrane damage, but increased neutrophil infiltration, myeloperoxidase activity, and muscle edema.
We conclude that the return to spontaneous breathing following 24 h of controlled MV does not exacerbate MV-induced diaphragm contractile dysfunction or result in fiber membrane damage, but increases neutrophil infiltration.
机械通气(MV)在临床上用于治疗无法维持足够肺泡通气的患者。长时间机械通气与膈肌萎缩以及最大比肌力产生(P(O))的下降有关。总体而言,这些改变可能使膈肌在恢复自主呼吸(即再负荷)时更易受到损伤。因此,这些实验检验了以下假设:机械通气后膈肌再负荷会加剧机械通气诱导的膈肌收缩功能障碍,同时导致肌纤维膜损伤和炎症。
为验证这一假设,将Sprague-Dawley大鼠随机分为以下几组:(1)对照组;(2)24小时控制性机械通气组;(3)24小时控制性机械通气后再进行2小时麻醉状态下自主呼吸组。对照组短期麻醉但未接受机械通气,而机械通气组动物接受麻醉、气管切开并进行通气。再负荷组动物仍处于麻醉状态,但停止机械通气并恢复自主呼吸2小时。
与对照组动物相比,机械通气导致膈肌比P(O)下降26%,且通过膜通透性增加(使用丙溴胺橙技术测量)未发现肌纤维膜损伤。此外,中性粒细胞或巨噬细胞浸润未增加。两小时的再负荷并未加剧机械通气诱导的膈肌收缩功能障碍或导致纤维膜损伤,但增加了中性粒细胞浸润、髓过氧化物酶活性和肌肉水肿。
我们得出结论,24小时控制性机械通气后恢复自主呼吸不会加剧机械通气诱导的膈肌收缩功能障碍或导致纤维膜损伤,但会增加中性粒细胞浸润。