• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下落着地时额状面和矢状面生物力学的性别差异。

Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings.

作者信息

Kernozek Thomas W, Torry Michael R, VAN Hoof Heather, Cowley Hanni, Tanner Suzanne

机构信息

Department of Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jun;37(6):1003-12; discussion 1013.

PMID:15947726
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine gender differences in lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics between age- and skill-matched recreational athletes.

METHODS

Inverse dynamic solutions estimated the lower-extremity flexion-extension and varus-valgus kinematics and kinetics for 15 females and 15 males performing a 60-cm drop landing. A mixed model, repeated measures analysis of variance (gender (*) joint) was performed on select kinematic and kinetic variables.

RESULTS

Peak hip and knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion angles were greater in females in the sagittal plane (group effect, P < 0.02). Females exhibited greater frontal plane motion (group () joint, P = 0.02). Differences were attributed to greater peak knee valgus and peak ankle pronation angles (post hoc tests, P = 0.00). Females exhibited a greater range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane (group main effect, P = 0.02) and the frontal plane (group () joint, P = 0.01). Differences were attributed to the greater knee varus-valgus ROM, ankle dorsiflexion, and pronation ROM (post hoc tests). Ground reaction forces were different between groups (group (*) direction, P = 0.05). Females exhibited greater peak vertical and posterior (A/P) force than males (post hoc tests). Females exhibited different knee moment profiles (Group main effect, P = 0.01). These differences were attributed to a reduced varus moment in females (post hoc tests).

CONCLUSION

The majority of the differences in kinematic and kinetic variables between male and female recreational athletes during landing were observed in the frontal plane not in the sagittal plane. Specifically, females generated a smaller internal knee varus moment at the time of peak valgus knee angulation.

摘要

目的

确定年龄和技能匹配的休闲运动员在下肢关节运动学和动力学方面的性别差异。

方法

采用逆动力学方法,对15名女性和15名男性进行60厘米下落着地动作时的下肢屈伸和内翻-外翻运动学及动力学进行评估。对选定的运动学和动力学变量进行混合模型重复测量方差分析(性别(*)关节)。

结果

在矢状面,女性的髋、膝屈曲峰值和踝关节背屈角度更大(组效应,P<0.02)。女性在额状面的运动更大(组()关节,P = 0.02)。差异归因于更大的膝关节外翻峰值和踝关节内旋峰值角度(事后检验,P = 0.00)。女性在矢状面(组主效应,P = 0.02)和额状面(组()关节,P = 0.01)的运动范围更大。差异归因于更大的膝关节内翻-外翻运动范围、踝关节背屈和内旋运动范围(事后检验)。两组之间的地面反作用力不同(组(*)方向,P = 0.05)。女性比男性表现出更大的垂直和向后(前后)力峰值(事后检验)。女性的膝关节力矩曲线不同(组主效应,P = 0.01)。这些差异归因于女性内翻力矩减小(事后检验)。

结论

男女休闲运动员在着地过程中运动学和动力学变量的大多数差异在额状面而非矢状面被观察到。具体而言,女性在膝关节外翻角度峰值时产生的膝关节内翻力矩较小。

相似文献

1
Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings.下落着地时额状面和矢状面生物力学的性别差异。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jun;37(6):1003-12; discussion 1013.
2
Timing of lower extremity frontal plane motion differs between female and male athletes during a landing task.女性和男性运动员在着陆任务中下肢额状面运动的时间不同。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1517-21. doi: 10.1177/0363546510397175. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
Peak Lower Extremity Landing Kinematics in Dancers and Nondancers.舞者与非舞者下肢落地运动学峰值比较。
J Athl Train. 2018 Apr;53(4):379-385. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-465-16. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
4
Lower extremity energy absorption and biomechanics during landing, part II: frontal-plane energy analyses and interplanar relationships.下肢落地时的能量吸收和生物力学,第二部分:额状面能量分析和平面间关系。
J Athl Train. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):757-63. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.10. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Landing Kinematics and Kinetics at the Knee During Different Landing Tasks.不同着陆任务时膝关节的运动学和动力学特征。
J Athl Train. 2017 Dec;52(12):1101-1108. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.11.25. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Physiological coxa varus-genu valgus influences internal knee and ankle joint moments in females during crossover cutting.生理性髋内翻-膝外翻影响女性交叉切入动作时的膝关节和踝关节内力矩。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Jul;12(4):285-93. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0430-3. Epub 2003 Nov 15.
7
Weight-Bearing Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.慢性踝关节不稳患者的负重背屈活动范围及着地生物力学
J Athl Train. 2015 Aug;50(8):833-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.5.07. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Lower extremity energy absorption and biomechanics during landing, part I: sagittal-plane energy absorption analyses.下肢在着陆过程中的能量吸收和生物力学,第 I 部分:矢状面能量吸收分析。
J Athl Train. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):748-56. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.09. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
9
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion is associated with kinematic but not kinetic variables related to bilateral drop-landing performance at various drop heights.踝关节背屈活动范围与不同下落高度下双侧下落着地表现的运动学变量相关,但与动力学变量无关。
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Apr;64:320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
10
Comparison of estimated anterior cruciate ligament tension during a typical and flexed knee and hip drop landing using sagittal plane knee modeling.采用矢状面膝关节建模比较典型和屈膝屈髋下落着地时前交叉韧带的张力估计。
Int J Sports Med. 2012 May;33(5):381-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299750. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of sex in diagnostic modelling of knee osteoarthritis.性别在膝关节骨关节炎诊断模型中的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0325681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325681. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effects of a 12-Week Training Multicomponent Exercise Program on Landing Mechanics in Recreational Athletes.一项为期12周的多组分运动训练计划对业余运动员落地力学的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;12(23):2327. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232327.
3
Dynamic postural control in women athletes with and without nonspecific low back pain with high and low pain-related anxiety- A case-control study.
有和无非特异性下腰痛且疼痛相关焦虑程度高和低的女运动员的动态姿势控制——一项病例对照研究。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 7;15(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00764-7.
4
Differences in running biomechanics between young, healthy men and women carrying external loads.年轻健康的男性和女性在背负外部负荷时跑步生物力学的差异。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Oct 3;11:1250937. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1250937. eCollection 2023.
5
Muscle Activation and Ground Reaction Force between Single-Leg Drop Landing and Jump Landing among Young Females during Weight-Acceptance Phase.年轻女性在负重接受阶段单腿下落着地与跳跃着地时的肌肉激活和地面反作用力
Sports (Basel). 2023 Sep 18;11(9):185. doi: 10.3390/sports11090185.
6
The effect of dual-task on jump landing kinematics and kinetics in female athletes with or without dynamic knee valgus.双任务对有或无动态膝外翻的女性运动员跳跃着陆运动学和动力学的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41648-7.
7
Knee joint biomechanics and cartilage damage prediction during landing: A hybrid MD-FE-musculoskeletal modeling.膝关节生物力学与着陆过程中软骨损伤预测:混合 MD-FE-肌肉骨骼建模。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0287479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287479. eCollection 2023.
8
Effects of a 4-week plyometric training on activity patterns during different phases of one-leg drop jump with focus on jump height.四周增强式训练对单腿跳下不同阶段活动模式的影响,重点关注跳跃高度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 6;13(1):9192. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36461-1.
9
Frontal Plane Neurokinematic Mechanisms Stabilizing the Knee and the Pelvis during Unilateral Countermovement Jump in Young Trained Males.在年轻男性进行单侧反向跳跃时,额状面神经运动机制稳定膝关节和骨盆。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010220.
10
Effect of different landing actions on knee joint biomechanics of female college athletes: Based on opensim simulation.不同落地动作对女大学生运动员膝关节生物力学的影响:基于OpenSim模拟
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 26;10:899799. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.899799. eCollection 2022.