Laboratoire de Psychologie et Neurocognition (LPNC, CNRS 5105), Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, 1251 Rue des Universités, 38400, Grenoble, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):2022-2052. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01615-7. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
Elaboration has emerged as a potential maintenance mechanism involved in the substantial contribution of long-term memory (LTM) to working memory (WM) performance. The objective of the current study was to determine whether elaborative strategies could be spontaneously implemented under favorable conditions. Across four experiments, the distribution of free-time periods was manipulated in a complex span task, while keeping the total amount of free time and cognitive load constant. As elaboration requires time to be set up, Experiment 1 elicited better WM performance in a condition with fewer long free-time periods compared to a condition with many short free-time periods. However, because this benefit did not persist during delayed recall, the following experiments aimed to further investigate this effect by manipulating factors supposed to modulate elaboration. In Experiment 2, half of the participants received no specific instructions regarding strategies whereas the other half were encouraged to use elaborative strategies. In Experiment 3, the to-be-maintained stimuli did or did not have LTM representations that are essential for elaboration (i.e., words or pseudowords). Finally, the last experiment used a self-strategy report to better understand the nature of the WM maintenance strategies spontaneously employed by participants. Despite a consistent effect of free time manipulation on WM recall, the explanatory assumption of elaboration was challenged by the unexpected lack of effect on LTM recall and on the type of strategy reported. Alternative explanations stemming from well-known factors influencing WM performance are discussed, and emphasis is placed on the potential contribution of direct semantic maintenance in WM.
细化已成为参与长期记忆 (LTM) 对工作记忆 (WM) 性能的实质性贡献的潜在维护机制。本研究的目的是确定在有利条件下是否可以自发实施详尽的策略。在四项实验中,通过在复杂跨度任务中操纵自由时间周期的分布,同时保持总自由时间和认知负荷不变。由于详尽的信息处理需要时间来建立,因此实验 1 与许多短的自由时间周期相比,在长的自由时间周期较少的条件下,WM 表现更好。然而,由于这种益处在延迟回忆期间并未持续,因此以下实验旨在通过操纵被认为可以调节详尽信息处理的因素来进一步研究这种影响。在实验 2 中,一半的参与者没有关于策略的具体说明,而另一半则被鼓励使用详尽的策略。在实验 3 中,要保持的刺激物是否具有对详尽信息处理至关重要的 LTM 表示(即单词或伪单词)。最后,最后一个实验使用自我策略报告来更好地理解参与者自发使用的 WM 维护策略的性质。尽管自由时间操作对 WM 回忆有一致的影响,但详尽信息处理的解释性假设受到对 LTM 回忆和报告的策略类型没有影响的挑战。讨论了源自影响 WM 性能的知名因素的替代解释,并强调了直接语义维护在 WM 中的潜在贡献。