• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与弱势群体的合作研究伙伴关系:挑战与潜在解决方案。

Collaborative research partnerships with disadvantaged communities: challenges and potential solutions.

作者信息

El Ansari W

机构信息

Postgraduate Programme in Public Health, School of Health and Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, Jack Straws Lane, Martson Road, Oxford OX3 0FL, UK.

出版信息

Public Health. 2005 Sep;119(9):758-70. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.01.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2005.01.014
PMID:15950252
Abstract

Community/campus research collaborations face multiple challenges. An understanding of the community's background, history, habits and traditions, values and mode of operations is required. This article narrates a 3-year experience of undertaking collaborative public health research with five disadvantaged communities in various provinces of South Africa. Based on the experience, five main challenges exist: the value systems of those collaborating in the research; the stakeholders' costs and benefits of being involved; issues of empowerment and capacity transfer; the need for multidisciplinary research approaches; and the prerequisite of the clarity of relationships and roles between researcher and community. Categorized under the five main challenges are examples of 19 interlacing 'concepts' that detailed the South African research partnership from the perspective of the processes, dealings and daily difficulties. Examples of the challenges and concepts are highlighted from the author's research experiences with disadvantaged communities. These challenges increase exponentially with the inclusion of more research sites, more stakeholders or when undertaking cluster research. Possible preventative measures or solutions to the problems are suggested. Both the 'town' and 'gown' partners are required to attend to a multitude of factors when embarking on collaborative community-based research.

摘要

社区/校园研究合作面临多重挑战。需要了解社区的背景、历史、习惯与传统、价值观及运作模式。本文讲述了与南非各省五个弱势社区开展公共卫生合作研究的三年经历。基于该经历,存在五个主要挑战:研究合作方的价值体系;利益相关者参与的成本与收益;赋权及能力转移问题;多学科研究方法的需求;以及研究者与社区之间关系和角色清晰明确的前提条件。在这五个主要挑战之下分类列出了19个相互交织的“概念”示例,这些示例从过程、交往及日常困难的角度详细阐述了南非的研究伙伴关系。文中从作者与弱势社区的研究经历中突出了挑战及概念的示例。随着纳入更多研究地点、更多利益相关者或开展整群研究,这些挑战会成倍增加。文中还提出了针对这些问题可能的预防措施或解决方案。“城镇”和“高校”伙伴在开展基于社区的合作研究时都需要考虑诸多因素。

相似文献

1
Collaborative research partnerships with disadvantaged communities: challenges and potential solutions.与弱势群体的合作研究伙伴关系:挑战与潜在解决方案。
Public Health. 2005 Sep;119(9):758-70. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.01.014.
2
Community partnerships: translating research for community development.社区伙伴关系:将研究成果转化为社区发展动力。
Can J Nurs Res. 2005 Mar;37(1):169-75.
3
Use of a university-community collaboration model to frame issues and set an agenda for strengthening a community.运用大学与社区合作模式来界定问题并制定加强社区建设的议程。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Oct;4(4):385-92. doi: 10.1177/1524839903255467.
4
Striving to provide opportunities for farm worker community participation in research.努力为农场工人社区参与研究提供机会。
J Agric Saf Health. 2008 Apr;14(2):205-19. doi: 10.13031/2013.24351.
5
The role of Latino/Hispanic communities in health services research: strategies for a meaningful partnership.拉丁裔/西班牙裔社区在卫生服务研究中的作用:建立有意义伙伴关系的策略。
J Med Syst. 1996 Oct;20(5):317-28. doi: 10.1007/BF02257043.
6
The making of an interdisciplinary partnership: the case of the Chicago Food System Collaborative.跨学科伙伴关系的形成:以芝加哥食品系统协作组织为例。
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9067-y.
7
Partnering with community-based organizations: an academic institution's evolving perspective.与社区组织合作:学术机构不断演变的视角。
Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1 Suppl 1):S27-32.
8
Doing community-driven research: a description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities.开展社区驱动型研究:西雅图健康社区伙伴组织介绍
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):519-34. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.519.
9
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question.南非基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR):让多方利益相关者参与以确定研究问题
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.041. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
10
Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York.纽约哈莱姆区一个城市研究中心的社区成员、当地医疗服务提供者和研究人员之间的合作。
Public Health Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;116(6):530-9. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.6.530.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity in the medical research ecosystem: a descriptive scientometric analysis of over 49 000 studies and 150 000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022.医学研究生态系统中的多样性:对2007年至2022年期间发表在高影响力医学期刊上的49000多项研究和150000多名作者的描述性科学计量分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e086982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086982.
2
Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022.多样性会催生多样性吗?对2007年至2022年间发表在高影响力医学期刊上的15万多项研究和4.9万多名作者的科学计量分析。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 22:2024.03.21.24304695. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304695.
3
Synergies, strengths and challenges: findings on community capability from a systematic health systems research literature review.
协同作用、优势与挑战:基于系统的卫生系统研究文献综述对社区能力的研究发现
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(Suppl 7):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1860-1.
4
Experiences from a pilot study on how to conduct a qualitative multi-country research project regarding use of antibiotics in Southeast Europe.一项关于如何在东南欧开展一项关于抗生素使用的定性多国研究项目的试点研究经验。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 May 23;9:20. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0069-3. eCollection 2016.
5
Community Participation in Health Systems Research: A Systematic Review Assessing the State of Research, the Nature of Interventions Involved and the Features of Engagement with Communities.社区参与卫生系统研究:一项系统评价,评估研究现状、所涉及干预措施的性质以及与社区互动的特征。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0141091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141091. eCollection 2015.
6
Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African-Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers.考虑为随机人群健康干预试验做准备:来自南非-加拿大合作改善卫生工作者健康的经验教训。
Glob Health Action. 2014 May 2;7:23594. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23594. eCollection 2014.
7
Supporting southern-led research: implications for North-South research partnerships.支持南方主导的研究:对南北研究伙伴关系的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;103(2):128-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03404217.
8
Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives.患者-专家研究伙伴关系:如何激发患者观点的包容性。
Health Expect. 2011 Sep;14(3):225-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00647.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
Engagement and action for health: the contribution of leaders' collaborative skills to partnership success.促进健康的参与和行动:领导者的协作技能对伙伴关系成功的贡献。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jan;6(1):361-81. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010361. Epub 2008 Jan 21.