George Asha S, Scott Kerry, Mehra Vrinda, Sriram Veena
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
South African Research Chair in Health Systems, Complexity and Social Change, School of Public Health, University of Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(Suppl 7):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1860-1.
Community capability is the combined influence of a community's social systems and collective resources that can address community problems and broaden community opportunities. We frame it as consisting of three domains that together support community empowerment: what communities have; how communities act; and for whom communities act. We sought to further understand these domains through a secondary analysis of a previous systematic review on community participation in health systems interventions in low and middle income countries (LMICs).
We searched for journal articles published between 2000 and 2012 related to the concepts of "community", "capability/participation", "health systems research" and "LMIC." We identified 64 with rich accounts of community participation involving service delivery and governance in health systems research for thematic analysis following the three domains framing community capability.
When considering what communities have, articles reported external linkages as the most frequently gained resource, especially when partnerships resulted in more community power over the intervention. In contrast, financial assets were the least mentioned, despite their importance for sustainability. With how communities act, articles discussed challenges of ensuring inclusive participation and detailed strategies to improve inclusiveness. Very little was reported about strengthening community cohesiveness and collective efficacy despite their importance in community initiatives. When reviewing for whom communities act, the importance of strong local leadership was mentioned frequently, while conflict resolution strategies and skills were rarely discussed. Synergies were found across these elements of community capability, with tangible success in one area leading to positive changes in another. Access to information and opportunities to develop skills were crucial to community participation, critical thinking, problem solving and ownership. Although there are many quantitative scales measuring community capability, health systems research engaged with community participation has rarely made use of these tools or the concepts informing them. Overall, the amount of information related to elements of community capability reported by these articles was low and often of poor quality.
Strengthening community capability is critical to ensuring that community participation leads to genuine empowerment. Our simpler framework to define community capability may help researchers better recognize, support and assess it.
社区能力是社区社会系统和集体资源的综合影响力,能够解决社区问题并拓展社区机会。我们将其界定为由三个领域构成,共同支持社区赋权:社区拥有什么;社区如何行动;社区为谁行动。我们试图通过对先前一项关于低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)社区参与卫生系统干预的系统评价进行二次分析,来进一步理解这些领域。
我们检索了2000年至2012年间发表的与“社区”“能力/参与”“卫生系统研究”和“低收入和中等收入国家”概念相关的期刊文章。我们识别出64篇对社区参与有丰富描述的文章,这些文章涉及卫生系统研究中的服务提供和治理,按照界定社区能力的三个领域进行主题分析。
在考虑社区拥有什么时,文章报道外部联系是最常获得的资源,尤其是当伙伴关系使社区对干预有更多权力时。相比之下,金融资产虽对可持续性很重要,但提及最少。关于社区如何行动,文章讨论了确保包容性参与的挑战以及提高包容性的详细策略。尽管社区凝聚力和集体效能在社区倡议中很重要,但关于加强这方面的报道很少。在审视社区为谁行动时,经常提到强大的地方领导力的重要性,而冲突解决策略和技能很少被讨论。在社区能力的这些要素之间发现了协同作用,一个领域的切实成功会导致另一个领域的积极变化。获取信息和发展技能的机会对社区参与、批判性思维、问题解决和自主掌控至关重要。尽管有许多定量量表用于衡量社区能力,但参与社区参与的卫生系统研究很少使用这些工具或其背后的概念。总体而言,这些文章报道的与社区能力要素相关的信息量较低且质量往往较差。
加强社区能力对于确保社区参与带来真正的赋权至关重要。我们更简单的界定社区能力的框架可能有助于研究人员更好地识别、支持和评估它。