• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

戒烟治疗的报销可能会使戒烟率翻倍:一项随机试验的结果。

Reimbursement for smoking cessation treatment may double the abstinence rate: results of a randomized trial.

作者信息

Kaper J, Wagena E J, Willemsen M C, van Schayck C P

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 3200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Addiction. 2005 Jul;100(7):1012-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01097.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01097.x
PMID:15955017
Abstract

AIMS

Few smokers who try to quit smoking use smoking cessation treatment (SCT), and cost could be one factor. To increase the number of successful quitters, we assessed whether financial reimbursement for SCT would encourage the use of SCT and would as a result increase the 6-month point abstinence rate.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We recruited smokers aged over 18 years from a random sample of Dutch inhabitants insured by one health insurance company. INTERVENTION AND DESIGN: The smokers were assigned randomly to the intervention group (n = 632) or control group (n = 634). Respondents in the intervention group received an offer of reimbursement for nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion and behavioural counselling. No reimbursement was offered to the control group. To preclude a change of behaviour due to disappointment in the control group, we used a randomized consent design.

FINDINGS

During the reimbursement period, 10.8% smokers in the intervention group reported having used SCT compared with 4.1% in the control group (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7). In the intervention group, 23.4% smokers tried to stop compared with 20.8% in the control group (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-2.4). After 6 months, the biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate was 5.5% in the intervention group and 2.8% in the control group (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Reimbursement for SCT seems efficacious in increasing the use of SCT and may double the number of successful quitters.

摘要

目的

尝试戒烟的吸烟者中很少有人使用戒烟治疗(SCT),费用可能是一个因素。为了增加成功戒烟者的数量,我们评估了SCT的费用报销是否会鼓励人们使用SCT,从而提高6个月时的戒烟率。

背景与参与者

我们从一家健康保险公司承保的荷兰居民随机样本中招募了18岁以上的吸烟者。

干预与设计

吸烟者被随机分配到干预组(n = 632)或对照组(n = 634)。干预组的受访者可获得尼古丁替代疗法、安非他酮和行为咨询的费用报销。对照组则不提供报销。为了避免对照组因失望而改变行为,我们采用了随机同意设计。

研究结果

在报销期间,干预组中有10.8%的吸烟者报告使用了SCT,而对照组为4.1%(比值比=2.9,95%置信区间1.8 - 4.7)。干预组中有23.4%的吸烟者尝试戒烟,而对照组为20.8%(比值比=1.2,95%置信区间0.9 - 2.4)。6个月后,经生化验证的7天点患病率戒烟率在干预组为5.5%,在对照组为2.8%(比值比=2.3,95%置信区间1.2 - 4.1)。

结论

SCT费用报销似乎能有效增加SCT的使用,并可能使成功戒烟者的数量翻倍。

相似文献

1
Reimbursement for smoking cessation treatment may double the abstinence rate: results of a randomized trial.戒烟治疗的报销可能会使戒烟率翻倍:一项随机试验的结果。
Addiction. 2005 Jul;100(7):1012-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01097.x.
2
A randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation therapy on sustained abstinence.一项评估报销戒烟治疗费用对持续戒烟效果影响的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2006 Nov;101(11):1656-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01578.x.
3
The effect of proactively identifying smokers and offering smoking cessation support in primary care populations: a cluster-randomized trial.在基层医疗人群中主动识别吸烟者并提供戒烟支持的效果:一项整群随机试验。
Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):998-1006; discussion 1007-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02206.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
4
Encouraging smokers to quit: the cost effectiveness of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation treatment.鼓励吸烟者戒烟:报销戒烟治疗费用的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(5):453-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624050-00004.
5
Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention.美好结局:一项数字多媒体戒烟干预的随机对照试验
Addiction. 2008 Mar;103(3):478-84; discussion 485-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02119.x.
6
Smoking cessation intervention in parents of young children: a randomised controlled trial.针对幼儿父母的戒烟干预:一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2005 Nov;100(11):1731-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01231.x.
7
A randomized trial assessing the Five-Day Plan for smoking cessation.一项评估戒烟五日计划的随机试验。
Addiction. 2005 Oct;100(10):1546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01215.x.
8
Effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention in older adults.针对老年人的戒烟干预措施的有效性。
Addiction. 2007 Jan;102(1):148-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01647.x.
9
Randomized trial of an intervention to facilitate recycling for relapsed smokers.一项促进复吸吸烟者戒烟的干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Oct;31(4):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.021. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
10
A 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bupropion sr added to high-dose dual nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation or reduction in schizophrenia.一项为期12周的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,该研究将安非他酮缓释剂添加至高剂量双重尼古丁替代疗法中,用于精神分裂症患者戒烟或减少吸烟量。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;27(4):380-6. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0b013e3180ca86fa.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the feasibility of pharmacist-facilitated tobacco cessation interventions in independent community pharmacies in rural Appalachia.评估药剂师在阿巴拉契亚农村独立社区药房中实施烟草戒断干预措施的可行性。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Nov-Dec;62(6):1807-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
2
Variability in patient sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and healthcare service utilization among 107,302 treatment seeking smokers in Ontario: A cross-sectional comparison.在安大略省寻求治疗的 107302 名吸烟者中,患者社会人口统计学、临床特征和医疗服务利用的变异性:横断面比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0235709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235709. eCollection 2020.
3
Smoking Cessation Attempts and Common Strategies Employed.
戒烟尝试和常用策略。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Jan 6;117(1-2):7-13. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0007.
4
Subsidized pharmacological treatment for smoking cessation by the Spanish public health system: A randomized, pragmatic, clinical trial by clusters.西班牙公共卫生系统提供的戒烟药物补贴治疗:一项整群随机实用临床试验。
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Sep 5;17:64. doi: 10.18332/tid/111368. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluating the Impact of Eliminating Copayments for Tobacco Cessation Pharmacotherapy.评估取消戒烟药物治疗共付额的影响。
Med Care. 2018 Nov;56(11):912-918. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000987.
6
Factors Correlated with Success Rate of Outpatient Smoking Cessation Services in Taiwan.台湾地区门诊戒烟服务成功率相关因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 10;15(6):1218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061218.
7
Does free or lower cost smoking cessation medication stimulate quitting? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands and UK Surveys.免费或低价戒烟药物是否能刺激戒烟?来自国际烟草控制(ITC)荷兰和英国调查的发现。
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(Suppl 1):s61-s67. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054023. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
8
A Randomized Trial of Incentives for Smoking Treatment in Medicaid Members.一项针对医疗补助计划成员中吸烟治疗的激励措施的随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):754-763. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment.用于增加烟草依赖治疗使用的医疗保健融资系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD004305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004305.pub5.
10
Smoking cessation for free: outcomes of a study of three Romanian clinics.免费戒烟:一项针对罗马尼亚三家诊所的研究结果
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Dec 30;11(1):605-610. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0098. eCollection 2016.