Institute of General Medicine, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty ofthe Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf; Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care,University College London, London, UK; Section for Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Jan 6;117(1-2):7-13. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0007.
Clinical guidelines on smoking cessation contain recommendations for various evidence-based methods. The goal of this study was to provide a represen- tative analysis for Germany of the percentage of smokers who try to quit smoking at least once per year, the use of evidence-based methods and other methods of smoking cessation, and potential associations of the use of such methods with the degree of tobacco dependence and with socioeconomic features.
Data from 19 waves of the German Smoking Behavior Questionnaire (Deutsche Befragung zum Rauchverhalten, DEBRA), from the time period June/July 2016 to June/July 2019, were analyzed. Current smokers and recent ex-smokers (<12 months without smoking) were asked about their smoking cessation attempts in the past year and the methods they used during the last attempt (naming more than one method was permitted). The degree of tobacco dependence in current smokers was assessed with the Heaviness of Smoking Index.
Out of 11 109 current smokers and 407 recent ex-smokers, 19.9% (95% confidence interval: [19.1; 20.6]) had tried to quit smoking at least once in the preceding year. 13.0% of them [11.6; 14.5] had used at least one evidence-based method during their last attempt. The stronger the tobacco dependence, the more likely the use of an evidence-based method (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27 [1.16; 1.40]). Pharmacotherapy (nicotine replacement therapy, medication) was used more com- monly by persons with higher incomes (OR = 1.44 per 1000 euro/month [1.28; 1.62]). Electronic cigarettes were the most commonly used single type of smoking cessation support (10.2 % [9.0; 11.6]).
In Germany, only one in five smokers tries to quit smoking at least once per year. Such attempts are only rarely supported by evidence-based methods and are thus likely to fail. The high cost of treatment must be borne by the individual and thus fall disproportionately on poorer smokers. It follows that there is an urgent need for vered by health insurance pro- viders, in order to give all smokers fair and equal access to the medical care they need.
戒烟临床指南包含了各种基于证据的方法的建议。本研究的目的是为德国提供一个代表性的分析,即每年至少尝试戒烟一次的吸烟者比例、使用基于证据的方法和其他戒烟方法,以及使用这些方法与烟草依赖程度和社会经济特征的潜在关联。
对 2016 年 6 月/7 月至 2019 年 6 月/7 月期间的 19 个德国吸烟行为调查问卷(Deutsche Befragung zum Rauchverhalten,DEBRA)的调查数据进行了分析。当前吸烟者和近期戒烟者(<12 个月未吸烟)被问及他们在过去一年中尝试戒烟的情况,以及他们在最近一次尝试中使用的方法(允许同时提及多种方法)。当前吸烟者的烟草依赖程度用吸烟严重程度指数进行评估。
在 11109 名当前吸烟者和 407 名近期戒烟者中,19.9%(95%置信区间:[19.1; 20.6])在过去一年中至少尝试过一次戒烟。其中 13.0%(11.6; 14.5)在最近一次尝试中使用了至少一种基于证据的方法。烟草依赖程度越强,使用基于证据的方法的可能性就越大(比值比[OR] = 1.27 [1.16; 1.40])。药物治疗(尼古丁替代疗法、药物治疗)在收入较高的人群中更为常见(OR = 1.44/1000 欧元/月[1.28; 1.62])。电子烟是最常用的单一类型的戒烟支持(10.2%[9.0; 11.6])。
在德国,只有五分之一的吸烟者每年至少尝试戒烟一次。这些尝试很少得到基于证据的方法的支持,因此很可能会失败。治疗的高昂费用必须由个人承担,因此贫困吸烟者的负担不成比例。因此,迫切需要将其纳入健康保险范围,以便为所有吸烟者提供公平和平等的获得所需医疗服务的机会。