• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强力霉素联合利福平或强力霉素联合链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病。一项随机双盲研究。

Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline plus rifampin or doxycycline plus streptomycin. A randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Ariza J, Gudiol F, Pallares R, Viladrich P F, Rufi G, Corredoira J, Miravitlles M R

机构信息

Infectious Disease Service, Hospital de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):25-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-25.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-25
PMID:1596044
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of doxycycline-rifampin (DR) combination therapy with that of the classic doxycycline-streptomycin (DS) combination in patients with brucellosis.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind study, with a mean follow-up of 15.7 months.

SETTING

A 1000-bed teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain.

PATIENTS

Ninety-five patients (68 men and 27 women; mean age, 39 years) diagnosed with brucellosis on the basis of both clinical and serologic findings; 81 of these patients had blood cultures positive for Brucella melitensis.

INTERVENTIONS

Forty-four patients received doxycycline, 100 mg every 12 hours, and rifampin, 15 mg/kg body weight per day in a single morning dose, for 45 days; 51 patients received the same dose of doxycycline for 45 days plus streptomycin, 1 g/d for 15 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Therapeutic failure and relapse during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean time to defervescence was 4.2 days for the DR group and 3.2 days for the DS group (P greater than 0.2). The actuarial probability of therapeutic failure or relapse at 12 months of follow-up (Kaplan-Meier) was 14.4% in the DR group and 5.9% in the DS group (difference, 8.5%; 95% Cl, -4.8% to 21.6%; P greater than 0.2). All three patients with spondylitis in the DR group failed therapy compared with one of four patients in the DS group. Excluding patients with spondylitis, the actuarial failure rate was 4.9% and 4.3% in the DR and DS groups, respectively, at 12 months of follow-up (difference, 0.6%; Cl, -8.1% to 9.4%; P greater than 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Doxycycline-rifampin combination therapy for 45 days is as effective as the classic DS combination in most patients with brucellosis; however, DR therapy might be less effective in those patients with spondylitis.

摘要

目的

比较多西环素 - 利福平(DR)联合疗法与经典的多西环素 - 链霉素(DS)联合疗法治疗布鲁氏菌病患者的疗效。

设计

一项随机双盲研究,平均随访15.7个月。

地点

西班牙巴塞罗那一家拥有1000张床位的教学医院。

患者

95例患者(68例男性和27例女性;平均年龄39岁),根据临床和血清学检查结果诊断为布鲁氏菌病;其中81例患者血培养布鲁氏菌羊种阳性。

干预措施

44例患者接受多西环素,每12小时100mg,利福平,每日15mg/kg体重,晨起单次给药,共45天;51例患者接受相同剂量多西环素治疗45天加链霉素,每日1g,共15天。

主要观察指标

随访期间的治疗失败和复发情况。

结果

DR组退热平均时间为4.2天,DS组为3.2天(P>0.2)。随访12个月时(Kaplan-Meier法)治疗失败或复发的精算概率,DR组为14.4%,DS组为5.9%(差异8.5%;95%CI,-4.8%至21.6%;P>0.2)。DR组3例脊柱炎患者治疗均失败,而DS组4例中有1例失败。排除脊柱炎患者后,随访12个月时DR组和DS组的精算失败率分别为4.9%和4.3%(差异0.6%;CI,-8.1%至9.4%;P>0.2)。

结论

多西环素 - 利福平联合治疗45天对大多数布鲁氏菌病患者与经典的DS联合疗法效果相同;然而,DR疗法对脊柱炎患者可能效果较差。

相似文献

1
Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline plus rifampin or doxycycline plus streptomycin. A randomized, double-blind study.强力霉素联合利福平或强力霉素联合链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病。一项随机双盲研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):25-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-25.
2
Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-streptomycin in treatment of human brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. The GECMEI Group. Grupo de Estudio de Castilla-la Mancha de Enfermedades Infecciosas.多西环素-利福平与多西环素-链霉素治疗羊种布鲁氏菌引起的人类布鲁氏菌病。GECMEI研究组。卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰传染病研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Sep;39(9):2061-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.9.2061.
3
Comparison of five antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of brucellar spondylitis: a prospective, randomized study.五种抗菌方案治疗布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Chemother. 2003 Oct;15(5):466-71. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.5.466.
4
Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.利福平-多西环素与四环素-链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):548-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.4.548.
5
[A comparative therapeutic and multicenter trial of rifampicin and doxycycline versus streptomycin and doxycycline in human brucellosis].利福平与强力霉素对比链霉素与强力霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的多中心对照试验
Med Clin (Barc). 1991 May 4;96(17):649-53.
6
Efficacy of gentamicin plus doxycycline versus streptomycin plus doxycycline in the treatment of brucellosis in humans.庆大霉素联合多西环素与链霉素联合多西环素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效比较
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1086/501359. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
7
Comparison between doxycycline-rifampin-amikacin and doxycycline-rifampin regimens in the treatment of brucellosis.多西环素-利福平-阿米卡星与多西环素-利福平方案治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;11(2):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
8
Comparison of doxycycline-streptomycin, doxycycline-rifampin, and ofloxacin-rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.多西环素-链霉素、多西环素-利福平与氧氟沙星-利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;16(4):e247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
9
Comparison of three different combination therapies in the treatment of human brucellosis.三种不同联合疗法治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较
Trop Doct. 2005 Oct;35(4):210-2. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938765.
10
Doxycycline plus streptomycin versus ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin in spinal brucellosis [ISRCTN31053647].多西环素联合链霉素与环丙沙星联合利福平治疗脊柱布鲁氏菌病的对比研究[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN31053647]
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 11;6:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Brucellosis and Rickettsiosis in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.儿童布鲁氏菌病和立克次氏体病的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):1465. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051465.
2
Selection of treatment strategies for lumbar Brucella spondylitis: a retrospective clinical study.腰椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎治疗策略的选择:一项回顾性临床研究。
Front Surg. 2024 Mar 22;11:1365498. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1365498. eCollection 2024.
3
Spondylitis: Current Knowledge and Recent Advances.脊柱炎:当前认知与最新进展
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 19;13(2):595. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020595.
4
Venous thrombosis, peripheral aneurysm formation, and fever in a feral pig hunter with Brucellosis.一名患有布鲁氏菌病的野猪猎人出现静脉血栓形成、外周动脉瘤及发热症状。
IDCases. 2022 Feb 10;27:e01449. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2022.e01449. eCollection 2022.
5
The current therapeutical strategies in human brucellosis.人布鲁氏菌病的当前治疗策略。
Infection. 2021 Oct;49(5):823-832. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01586-w. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
A new candidate vaccine for human brucellosis based on influenza viral vectors: a preliminary investigation for the development of an immunization schedule in a guinea pig model.基于流感病毒载体的人类布鲁氏菌病新型候选疫苗:豚鼠模型中免疫方案开发的初步研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Feb 16;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00801-y.
7
Improved Early Detection of Focal Brucellosis Complications with Anti- IgG.利用抗IgG抗体提高局灶性布鲁氏菌病并发症的早期检测率
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00903-20.
8
Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.人布鲁氏菌病的实验室诊断。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Nov 13;33(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-19. Print 2019 Dec 18.
9
Antimicrobial Resistance in , , and Other Rarely Investigated Veterinary and Zoonotic Pathogens.兽医和人畜共患病罕见病原体中的抗微生物药物耐药性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Jul;6(4). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0029-2017.
10
Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.利福平与链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0191993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191993. eCollection 2018.