• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同联合疗法治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较

Comparison of three different combination therapies in the treatment of human brucellosis.

作者信息

Ersoy Yasemin, Sonmez Emine, Tevfik Mehmet R, But Aype Dinç

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases & Clinical Microbiology, Inonu University, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.

出版信息

Trop Doct. 2005 Oct;35(4):210-2. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938765.

DOI:10.1258/004947505774938765
PMID:16354469
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of three different combination treatment regimens in human brucellosis were compared in 118 uncomplicated patients enrolled in a prospective study between May 1997 and December 2002. Brucellosis was diagnosed using standard clinical and microbiological findings. Patients with central nervous system involvement, spondylitis, endocarditis or children under 16 years of age were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 400 mg of ofloxacin plus 600 mg of rifampicin (OR, n = 41), 200 mg of doxycycline plus 600 mg of rifampicin (DR, n = 45) or 1g intramuscularly streptomycin (administered for three weeks) plus 200 mg doxycycline (DS, n = 32) daily for 6 weeks. All patients were followed up at least 6 months after cessation of therapy. There was no statistical difference between the groups on relapse rates and clinical response to the treatment (P>0.05). Five patients in OR (12.8%), six patients in DR (14.3%) and three patients in DS groups (9.7%) suffered relapse. The side-effects were seen in eight (19.5%), 21 (46.7%) and eight (25.0%) patients of OR, DR and DS groups, respectively. The use of combination therapy of ofloxacin plus rifampicin for 6 weeks was found to be as effective as DR and DS. The side-effects of therapy in OR and DS groups was less severe than in the DR group.

摘要

1997年5月至2002年12月期间,一项前瞻性研究纳入了118例非复杂性布鲁氏菌病患者,比较了三种不同联合治疗方案的疗效和耐受性。布鲁氏菌病根据标准临床和微生物学检查结果进行诊断。中枢神经系统受累、脊柱炎、心内膜炎患者或16岁以下儿童被排除在研究之外。患者被随机分配接受400毫克氧氟沙星加600毫克利福平(OR组,n = 41)、200毫克强力霉素加600毫克利福平(DR组,n = 45)或每日1克肌肉注射链霉素(连用三周)加200毫克强力霉素(DS组,n = 32),疗程6周。所有患者在治疗结束后至少随访6个月。各组间复发率和治疗临床反应无统计学差异(P>0.05)。OR组5例(12.8%)、DR组6例(14.3%)和DS组3例(9.7%)出现复发。OR组、DR组和DS组分别有8例(19.5%)、21例(46.7%)和8例(25.0%)患者出现副作用。发现氧氟沙星加利福平联合治疗6周与DR组和DS组疗效相当。OR组和DS组治疗副作用比DR组轻。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three different combination therapies in the treatment of human brucellosis.三种不同联合疗法治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较
Trop Doct. 2005 Oct;35(4):210-2. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938765.
2
Comparison between doxycycline-rifampin-amikacin and doxycycline-rifampin regimens in the treatment of brucellosis.多西环素-利福平-阿米卡星与多西环素-利福平方案治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;11(2):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
3
Efficacy of rifampicin plus doxycycline versus rifampicin plus quinolone in the treatment of brucellosis.利福平联合多西环素与利福平联合喹诺酮治疗布鲁氏菌病的疗效比较
Saudi Med J. 2002 Aug;23(8):921-4.
4
Efficacy of gentamicin plus doxycycline versus streptomycin plus doxycycline in the treatment of brucellosis in humans.庆大霉素联合多西环素与链霉素联合多西环素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效比较
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1086/501359. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
5
Comparison of doxycycline-streptomycin, doxycycline-rifampin, and ofloxacin-rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.多西环素-链霉素、多西环素-利福平与氧氟沙星-利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;16(4):e247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
6
Ofloxacin plus rifampicin versus doxycycline plus rifampicin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial [ISRCTN11871179].氧氟沙星联合利福平与多西环素联合利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机临床试验[ISRCTN11871179]
BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 23;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-18.
7
Comparison of five antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of brucellar spondylitis: a prospective, randomized study.五种抗菌方案治疗布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Chemother. 2003 Oct;15(5):466-71. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.5.466.
8
[A comparative therapeutic and multicenter trial of rifampicin and doxycycline versus streptomycin and doxycycline in human brucellosis].利福平与强力霉素对比链霉素与强力霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的多中心对照试验
Med Clin (Barc). 1991 May 4;96(17):649-53.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of gentamicin for 5 days plus doxycycline for 8 weeks versus streptomycin for 2 weeks plus doxycycline for 45 days in the treatment of human brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.比较 5 天庆大霉素加 8 周多西环素与 2 周链霉素加 45 天多西环素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 May;65(5):1028-35. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq064. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
10
Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-streptomycin in treatment of human brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. The GECMEI Group. Grupo de Estudio de Castilla-la Mancha de Enfermedades Infecciosas.多西环素-利福平与多西环素-链霉素治疗羊种布鲁氏菌引起的人类布鲁氏菌病。GECMEI研究组。卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰传染病研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Sep;39(9):2061-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.9.2061.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Lesion Resection and Posterior Lesion Debridement, Bone Grafting, Fusion and Internal Fixation Combined With Medication in the Treatment of Lumbar Brucellosis Spondylitis.内镜下病变切除术与后路病灶清除、植骨、融合及内固定联合药物治疗腰椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎的疗效比较
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Apr 18;18:1923-1934. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S496495. eCollection 2025.
2
Unravelling the challenge of cotrimoxazole and rifampin resistance in B. melitensis and B. abortus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.揭示羊布鲁氏菌和牛布鲁氏菌对复方新诺明和利福平耐药性的挑战:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 2;18(12):e0012630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012630. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Pediatric neurobrucellosis and atypical Guillain-Barré syndrome: an intriguing case unveiled.
小儿神经型布鲁氏菌病与非典型吉兰-巴雷综合征:揭示一个有趣的病例。
J Med Life. 2024 Aug;17(8):819-822. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0522.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies on antibiotic treatment of brucellosis.系统评价和荟萃分析比较临床研究抗生素治疗布鲁氏菌病。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 16;14(1):19037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69669-w.
5
Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗人类布鲁氏菌病策略的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 11;18(3):e0012010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Brucella species-induced brucellosis: Antimicrobial effects, potential resistance and toxicity of silver and gold nanosized particles.布鲁氏菌属引起的布鲁氏菌病:银和金纳米颗粒的抗菌作用、潜在耐药性和毒性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 14;17(7):e0269963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269963. eCollection 2022.
7
Diffuse Neurobrucellosis of Cerebellum, Brainstem, Spinal Cord, and Cauda Equina: A case report and Literature review.小脑、脑干、脊髓和马尾神经弥漫性神经型布鲁氏菌病:病例报告及文献复习。
J Radiol Case Rep. 2022 May 1;16(5):1-9. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v16i5.3960. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Gentamicin-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles Improve Its Therapeutic Effects on -Infected J774A.1 Murine Cells.载有庆大霉素的壳聚糖纳米颗粒提高其对感染的J774A.1小鼠细胞的治疗效果。
Galen Med J. 2019 Oct 29;8:e1296. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v8i0.1296. eCollection 2019.
9
Review of brucellosis in Nepal.尼泊尔布鲁氏菌病综述。
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2016 Dec 16;4(2):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2016.10.009. eCollection 2016 Dec.
10
Brucellosis in Nepal - A Potential Threat to Public Health Professionals.尼泊尔的布鲁氏菌病——对公共卫生专业人员的潜在威胁。
Curr Health Sci J. 2016 Oct-Dec;42(4):396-407. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.42.04.10. Epub 2016 Feb 28.