• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利福平-多西环素与四环素-链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验

Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.

作者信息

Ariza J, Gudiol F, Pallarés R, Rufí G, Fernández-Viladrich P

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):548-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.4.548.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.28.4.548
PMID:4073878
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC180303/
Abstract

In an attempt to compare the efficacy of rifampin-doxycycline with tetracycline-streptomycin for the treatment of human brucellosis, we administered both combinations for a 30-day period, similar to the period recommended by the World Health Organization in a prospective, randomized trial. Forty-six patients were included in the final study (36 men and 10 women); 41 had blood cultures positive for Brucella melitensis. The 28 patients in group A received tetracycline hydrochloride at doses of 0.5 g every 6 h or doxycycline at 100 mg every 12 h for 30 days plus 1 g of streptomycin a day for 21 days. The 18 patients in group B received rifampin at 15 mg/kg per day in a single morning dose plus 100 mg of doxycycline every 12 h for 30 days. For patients with focal disease from both groups, therapy was prolonged to 45 days. All patients underwent rigorous clinical and bacteriological long-term follow-up. There were no therapeutic failures in either group, and the defervescence period was similar for both groups (3.1 days for group A, 2.6 days for group B). Two patients (7.1%) from group A had relapses, as did seven (38.8%) from group B (P = 0.024), and blood cultures again became positive for B. melitensis in all of them. In both groups treatment was generally well tolerated. The results strongly suggest that the rifampin-doxycycline combination is a less efficacious mode of therapy for brucellosis to prevent relapses than is the classical tetracycline-streptomycin combination when both are administered for 30 days. A more prolonged period of administration of the rifampin-doxycycline combination may be required to obtain the same low relapse rate as that achieved with the classical tetracycline-streptomycin treatment.

摘要

为比较利福平 - 多西环素与四环素 - 链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效,我们在一项前瞻性随机试验中,按照世界卫生组织推荐的疗程,给予这两种联合用药方案各30天。最终研究纳入了46例患者(36例男性和10例女性);41例血培养布鲁氏菌羊种阳性。A组的28例患者接受盐酸四环素,每6小时0.5克或多西环素,每12小时100毫克,共30天,加链霉素每天1克,共21天。B组的18例患者接受利福平,每天15毫克/千克,晨起单次给药,加多西环素每12小时100毫克,共30天。两组有局灶性病变的患者,治疗延长至45天。所有患者均接受了严格的临床和细菌学长期随访。两组均无治疗失败病例,两组的退热期相似(A组3.1天,B组2.6天)。A组有2例患者(7.1%)复发,B组有7例(38.8%)复发(P = 0.024),所有复发患者血培养布鲁氏菌羊种再次呈阳性。两组治疗总体耐受性良好。结果强烈表明,当两种方案均给药30天时,与经典的四环素 - 链霉素联合用药相比,利福平 - 多西环素联合用药预防布鲁氏菌病复发的疗效较差。可能需要延长利福平 - 多西环素联合用药的疗程,以获得与经典四环素 - 链霉素治疗相同的低复发率。

相似文献

1
Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.利福平-多西环素与四环素-链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):548-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.4.548.
2
Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline plus rifampin or doxycycline plus streptomycin. A randomized, double-blind study.强力霉素联合利福平或强力霉素联合链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病。一项随机双盲研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):25-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-25.
3
Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-streptomycin in treatment of human brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. The GECMEI Group. Grupo de Estudio de Castilla-la Mancha de Enfermedades Infecciosas.多西环素-利福平与多西环素-链霉素治疗羊种布鲁氏菌引起的人类布鲁氏菌病。GECMEI研究组。卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰传染病研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Sep;39(9):2061-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.9.2061.
4
Comparative trial of doxycycline plus streptomycin versus doxycycline plus rifampin for the therapy of human brucellosis.强力霉素联合链霉素与强力霉素联合利福平治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验
Chemotherapy. 1989;35(2):146-52. doi: 10.1159/000238662.
5
Comparison of five antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of brucellar spondylitis: a prospective, randomized study.五种抗菌方案治疗布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Chemother. 2003 Oct;15(5):466-71. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.5.466.
6
[A comparative therapeutic and multicenter trial of rifampicin and doxycycline versus streptomycin and doxycycline in human brucellosis].利福平与强力霉素对比链霉素与强力霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的多中心对照试验
Med Clin (Barc). 1991 May 4;96(17):649-53.
7
Comparison of doxycycline-streptomycin, doxycycline-rifampin, and ofloxacin-rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.多西环素-链霉素、多西环素-利福平与氧氟沙星-利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;16(4):e247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
8
Doxycycline plus streptomycin versus ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin in spinal brucellosis [ISRCTN31053647].多西环素联合链霉素与环丙沙星联合利福平治疗脊柱布鲁氏菌病的对比研究[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN31053647]
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 11;6:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-72.
9
Administration of a triple versus a standard double antimicrobial regimen for human brucellosis more efficiently eliminates bacterial DNA load.对于人类布鲁氏菌病,采用三联抗菌方案而非标准双联抗菌方案给药能更有效地消除细菌DNA负荷。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7541-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03841-14. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
10
Comparison between doxycycline-rifampin-amikacin and doxycycline-rifampin regimens in the treatment of brucellosis.多西环素-利福平-阿米卡星与多西环素-利福平方案治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;11(2):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated therapeutic options for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.人布鲁氏菌病的治疗选择更新:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Aug 22;18(8):e0012405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012405. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Venous thrombosis, peripheral aneurysm formation, and fever in a feral pig hunter with Brucellosis.一名患有布鲁氏菌病的野猪猎人出现静脉血栓形成、外周动脉瘤及发热症状。
IDCases. 2022 Feb 10;27:e01449. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2022.e01449. eCollection 2022.
3
Antimicrobial Resistance in , , and Other Rarely Investigated Veterinary and Zoonotic Pathogens.兽医和人畜共患病罕见病原体中的抗微生物药物耐药性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Jul;6(4). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0029-2017.
4
Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.利福平与链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0191993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191993. eCollection 2018.
5
Brucellosis in Qatar: A retrospective cohort study.卡塔尔的布鲁氏菌病:一项回顾性队列研究。
Qatar Med J. 2014 Jun 16;2014(1):25-30. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2014.4. eCollection 2014.
6
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis.用于治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007179.pub2.
7
Human to human transmission of Brucella melitensis.布鲁氏菌 melitensis 的人传人传播。
Can J Infect Dis. 1995 May;6(3):153-5. doi: 10.1155/1995/909404.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.系统评价和随机临床试验荟萃分析治疗人类布鲁氏菌病。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032090. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
9
Brucellosis in India - a review.印度的布鲁氏菌病——综述
J Biosci. 2008 Nov;33(4):539-47. doi: 10.1007/s12038-008-0072-1.
10
Doxycycline plus streptomycin versus ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin in spinal brucellosis [ISRCTN31053647].多西环素联合链霉素与环丙沙星联合利福平治疗脊柱布鲁氏菌病的对比研究[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN31053647]
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 11;6:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-72.

本文引用的文献

1
[Relation between complement fixation and incomplete antibodies (Coombs' test) in human brucellosis].[人类布鲁氏菌病中补体结合与不完全抗体(库姆斯试验)之间的关系]
Rev Immunol Ther Antimicrob. 1954;18(4):288-98.
2
Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis in man.人类布鲁氏菌病的实验室诊断
Bull World Health Organ. 1961;24(1):73-84.
3
Oxytetracycline-streptomycin therapy in brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis.由羊布鲁氏菌引起的布鲁氏菌病的土霉素-链霉素疗法。
AMA Arch Intern Med. 1953 Feb;91(2):204-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1953.00240140064005.
4
Brucellosis treated with rifampicin.利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病。
Arch Dis Child. 1980 Jun;55(6):486-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.6.486.
5
[Current antimicrobial treatment of brucellosis].[布鲁氏菌病的当前抗菌治疗]
Med Clin (Barc). 1983 Dec 10;81(19):870-6.
6
[Antibiotic treatment of brucellosis (author's transl)].布鲁氏菌病的抗生素治疗(作者译)
Sem Hop. 1982 Feb 4;58(5):281-3.
7
The rose bengal plate agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis.孟加拉玫瑰红平板凝集试验在布鲁氏菌病诊断中的应用
Vet Rec. 1969 Dec 6;85(23):636-41. doi: 10.1136/vr.85.23.636.
8
In vitro susceptibility of Brucella to various antibiotics.布鲁氏菌对各种抗生素的体外敏感性。
Appl Microbiol. 1970 Oct;20(4):600-4. doi: 10.1128/am.20.4.600-604.1970.
9
A comparative study of therapeutic agents used for treatment of acute brucellosis.用于治疗急性布鲁氏菌病的治疗药物的比较研究。
Br J Clin Pract. 1973 Nov;27(11):410-3.
10
The effect of antibiotics on Escherichia coli ingested by macrophages.抗生素对巨噬细胞摄取的大肠杆菌的影响。
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1973 Mar;142(3):1048-50. doi: 10.3181/00379727-142-37173.