Suppr超能文献

利福平-多西环素与四环素-链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验

Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.

作者信息

Ariza J, Gudiol F, Pallarés R, Rufí G, Fernández-Viladrich P

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):548-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.4.548.

Abstract

In an attempt to compare the efficacy of rifampin-doxycycline with tetracycline-streptomycin for the treatment of human brucellosis, we administered both combinations for a 30-day period, similar to the period recommended by the World Health Organization in a prospective, randomized trial. Forty-six patients were included in the final study (36 men and 10 women); 41 had blood cultures positive for Brucella melitensis. The 28 patients in group A received tetracycline hydrochloride at doses of 0.5 g every 6 h or doxycycline at 100 mg every 12 h for 30 days plus 1 g of streptomycin a day for 21 days. The 18 patients in group B received rifampin at 15 mg/kg per day in a single morning dose plus 100 mg of doxycycline every 12 h for 30 days. For patients with focal disease from both groups, therapy was prolonged to 45 days. All patients underwent rigorous clinical and bacteriological long-term follow-up. There were no therapeutic failures in either group, and the defervescence period was similar for both groups (3.1 days for group A, 2.6 days for group B). Two patients (7.1%) from group A had relapses, as did seven (38.8%) from group B (P = 0.024), and blood cultures again became positive for B. melitensis in all of them. In both groups treatment was generally well tolerated. The results strongly suggest that the rifampin-doxycycline combination is a less efficacious mode of therapy for brucellosis to prevent relapses than is the classical tetracycline-streptomycin combination when both are administered for 30 days. A more prolonged period of administration of the rifampin-doxycycline combination may be required to obtain the same low relapse rate as that achieved with the classical tetracycline-streptomycin treatment.

摘要

为比较利福平 - 多西环素与四环素 - 链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效,我们在一项前瞻性随机试验中,按照世界卫生组织推荐的疗程,给予这两种联合用药方案各30天。最终研究纳入了46例患者(36例男性和10例女性);41例血培养布鲁氏菌羊种阳性。A组的28例患者接受盐酸四环素,每6小时0.5克或多西环素,每12小时100毫克,共30天,加链霉素每天1克,共21天。B组的18例患者接受利福平,每天15毫克/千克,晨起单次给药,加多西环素每12小时100毫克,共30天。两组有局灶性病变的患者,治疗延长至45天。所有患者均接受了严格的临床和细菌学长期随访。两组均无治疗失败病例,两组的退热期相似(A组3.1天,B组2.6天)。A组有2例患者(7.1%)复发,B组有7例(38.8%)复发(P = 0.024),所有复发患者血培养布鲁氏菌羊种再次呈阳性。两组治疗总体耐受性良好。结果强烈表明,当两种方案均给药30天时,与经典的四环素 - 链霉素联合用药相比,利福平 - 多西环素联合用药预防布鲁氏菌病复发的疗效较差。可能需要延长利福平 - 多西环素联合用药的疗程,以获得与经典四环素 - 链霉素治疗相同的低复发率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Brucellosis in Qatar: A retrospective cohort study.卡塔尔的布鲁氏菌病:一项回顾性队列研究。
Qatar Med J. 2014 Jun 16;2014(1):25-30. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2014.4. eCollection 2014.
6
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis.用于治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007179.pub2.
7
9
Brucellosis in India - a review.印度的布鲁氏菌病——综述
J Biosci. 2008 Nov;33(4):539-47. doi: 10.1007/s12038-008-0072-1.

本文引用的文献

4
Brucellosis treated with rifampicin.利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病。
Arch Dis Child. 1980 Jun;55(6):486-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.6.486.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验