• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安抚还是评判?父母对儿童健康监测项目实施的看法。

Reassurance or judgement? Parents' views on the delivery of child health surveillance programmes.

作者信息

Roche Brenda, Cowley Sarah, Salt Niki, Scammell Amy, Malone Mary, Savile Philippa, Aikens Daphine, Fitzpatrick Susan

机构信息

BRG--Wandsworth Primary Care Research Centre, Wandsworth PCT, Bolingbroke Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2005 Oct;22(5):507-12. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi046. Epub 2005 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmi046
PMID:15964869
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The first year of a child's life is a crucial time for child development. Current guidance about child health surveillance and health promotion programmes emphasises a partnership approach between health professionals and parents when it comes to child health care. Parents' voices have been largely absent from discussions about local child health programmes. For partnership working to be effective and for local services to be able to evolve effectively parents' views are vital.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore parents' views on the child health surveillance and health promotion programmes offered during the first year of their child's life. The study aimed to be consumer-led through the involvement of lead parents in all stages of the research process.

METHODS

This study employed a qualitative methodology of focus groups and individual interviews. 35 participants were drawn from three general practices using a snowball sampling technique. Eligibility was determined as parents with a child under the age of one year or expecting a baby within the study timescale and registered at one of the 3 general practices. Focus groups were led by three 'parent-researchers' and individual interviews were conducted by a researcher. All focus groups and interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed using Atlas.Ti.

RESULTS

Several main themes were identified in this study. Firstly, when discussing scheduled health checks for children under one year of age parents expressed more positive feelings for the eight-week check which was seen to be comprehensive and informative rather than the eight-month check which was viewed as bureaucratic and less reassuring. Secondly, parents clearly articulated a need for reassurance and support from health professionals involved in child health surveillance and health promotion programmes. Thirdly, a crucial professional in the delivery of these programmes was the health visitor. Whilst parents expressed support for the concept of health visitors some health visitors were seen as bureaucratic and as making judgements of need based on socio-economic factors. Finally, some parents spoke of feeling excluded from accessing support as they were deemed not to be 'in need'.

CONCLUSIONS

Wider concepts of partnership working between health professionals and parents, and, needs assessment are important to this study. Crucial elements of the partnership appear to be missing and this coupled with needs assessments that leave parents feeling excluded mean that there are discrepancies between expectations and experiences of parents. These issues require consideration in order to improve services and experiences.

摘要

背景

儿童生命的第一年是其成长发育的关键时期。当前有关儿童健康监测与健康促进项目的指南强调,在儿童医疗保健方面,健康专业人员与家长应采取合作方式。然而,在关于地方儿童健康项目的讨论中,基本没有家长的声音。要使合作有效开展,地方服务得以有效发展,家长的意见至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在探讨家长对其孩子一岁前接受的儿童健康监测与健康促进项目的看法。该研究旨在通过让主要家长参与研究过程的各个阶段,以消费者为主导。

方法

本研究采用焦点小组和个人访谈的定性方法。通过滚雪球抽样技术,从三家普通诊所选取了35名参与者。入选条件为孩子年龄在一岁以下或在研究时间段内即将分娩,且在这三家普通诊所之一登记的家长。焦点小组由三名“家长研究员”主持,个人访谈由一名研究员进行。所有焦点小组讨论和访谈均进行录音、转录,并使用Atlas.Ti软件进行分析。

结果

本研究确定了几个主要主题。首先,在讨论一岁以下儿童的定期健康检查时,家长对八周检查的评价更为积极,认为其全面且信息丰富,而对八个月检查则看法不佳,认为其官僚主义严重且缺乏安抚作用。其次,家长明确表示需要参与儿童健康监测与健康促进项目的健康专业人员给予安心和支持。第三,健康访视员是实施这些项目的关键专业人员。虽然家长对健康访视员这一概念表示支持,但有些健康访视员被认为官僚主义严重,且根据社会经济因素判断需求。最后,一些家长表示因被认为“不需要”而感觉无法获得支持。

结论

健康专业人员与家长之间更广泛的合作工作概念以及需求评估对本研究很重要。合作的关键要素似乎缺失,再加上需求评估让家长感到被排斥,这意味着家长的期望与体验之间存在差异。为了改善服务和体验,需要考虑这些问题。

相似文献

1
Reassurance or judgement? Parents' views on the delivery of child health surveillance programmes.安抚还是评判?父母对儿童健康监测项目实施的看法。
Fam Pract. 2005 Oct;22(5):507-12. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi046. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
2
Conducting routine health surveillance checks for two year olds by group assessment.通过集体评估对两岁儿童进行常规健康监测检查。
J Fam Health Care. 2003;13(3):75-9.
3
Fathers and the well-child visit.父亲与健康儿童检查
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612.
4
An exploration of best practice in multi-agency working and the experiences of families of children with complex health needs. What works well and what needs to be done to improve practice for the future?多机构合作的最佳实践探索以及有复杂健康需求儿童家庭的经历。哪些方面运作良好,未来需要做些什么来改进实践?
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):527-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01554.x.
5
Parents' perceptions of health professionals' responses when seeking help for their overweight children.父母在为超重子女寻求帮助时对医疗保健专业人员回应的看法。
Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;22(3):287-92. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh729. Epub 2005 Mar 16.
6
Parents' experiences of participation in the care of hospitalised children: a qualitative study.父母参与住院儿童护理的经历:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jul;43(5):535-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
7
Different priorities: a comparison of parents' and health professionals' perceptions of quality of life in quadriplegic cerebral palsy.不同的优先事项:父母与健康专业人员对四肢瘫型脑瘫患者生活质量认知的比较
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Feb;93(2):119-25. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.115055. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
8
Cooperation between parents and school nurses in primary schools: parents' perceptions.小学家长与学校护士之间的合作:家长的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):86-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00527.x.
9
Parents' information needs about the treatment of their chronically ill child: a qualitative study.父母对其慢性病患儿治疗的信息需求:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
10
Parent concerns and professional responses: the case of specific language impairment.家长的担忧与专业人士的应对:特定语言障碍案例
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Sep;55(518):710-4.

引用本文的文献

1
"": a qualitative description study exploring perceptions and experiences of early childhood healthcare among ethnically diverse caregivers in Aotearoa New Zealand.《“ ”:一项质性描述性研究,探索新西兰奥特亚罗瓦不同种族照顾者对幼儿期医疗保健的看法和经历》
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Sep 8;40:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100882. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Feeling the clunk: Managing and attributing uncertainty in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infancy.感受“咯噔”声:婴儿期髋关节发育不良筛查中不确定性的管理与归因
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100040.
3
Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care.
父母对六周婴儿检查的期望与体验:一项初级保健领域的定性研究
BJGP Open. 2020 Dec 15;4(5). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101110. Print 2020 Dec.
4
"Reassurance that you're doing okay, or guidance if you're not": A qualitative descriptive study of pregnant first time mothers' expectations and information needs about postnatal care in England.“让你安心,或为你提供指导”:一项关于英国初产妇对产后护理的期望和信息需求的定性描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2020 Oct;89:102813. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102813. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Parents' views on how health professionals should work with them now to get the best for their child in the future.家长对于医疗保健专业人员目前应如何与他们合作,以便未来为其子女争取最佳结果的看法。
Health Expect. 2014 Aug;17(4):477-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00774.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
6
Trends in the coverage of 'universal' child health reviews: observational study using routinely available data.“通用”儿童健康检查覆盖情况的趋势:使用常规可得数据的观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2012 Mar 28;2(2):e000759. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000759. Print 2012.
7
Developing and measuring resilience for population health.为人群健康培养并衡量恢复力。
Afr Health Sci. 2008 Dec;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41-3.