Blatteis Clark M, Li Shuxin, Li Zhonghua, Feleder Carlos, Perlik Vit
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, The University of Tennessee, Health Science Center, Memphis, 38163, USA.
Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2005 May;76(1-4):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2005.01.001. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
The innate immune system serves as the first line of host defense against the deleterious effects of invading infectious pathogens. Fever is the hallmark among the defense mechanisms evoked by the entry into the body of such pathogens. The conventional view of the steps that lead to fever production is that they begin with the biosynthesis of pyrogenic cytokines by mononuclear phagocytes stimulated by the pathogens, their release into the circulation and transport to the thermoregulatory center in the preoptic area (POA) of the anterior hypothalamus, and their induction there of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-dependent prostaglandin (PG)E(2), the putative final mediator of the febrile response. But data accumulated over the past 5 years have gradually challenged this classical concept, due mostly to the temporal incompatibility of the newer findings with this concatenation of events. Thus, the former studies generally overlooked that the production of cytokines and the transduction of their pyrogenic signals into fever-mediating PGE(2) proceed at relatively slow rates, significantly slower certainly than the onset latency of fever produced by the i.v. injection of bacterial endotoxic lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Here, we review the conflicts between the earlier and the more recent findings and summarize new data that reconcile many of the contradictions. A unified model based on these data explicating the generation and maintenance of the febrile response is presented. It postulates that the steps in the production of LPS fever occur in the following sequence: the immediate activation by LPS of the complement (C) cascade, the stimulation by the anaphylatoxic C component C5a of Kupffer cells, their consequent, virtually instantaneous release of PGE(2), its excitation of hepatic vagal afferents, their transmission of the induced signals to the POA via the ventral noradrenergic bundle, and the activation by the thus, locally released norepinephrine (NE) of neural alpha(1)- and glial alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. The activation of the first causes an immediate, PGE(2)-independent rise in core temperature (T(c)) [the early phase of fever; an antioxidant-sensitive PGE(2) rise, however, accompanies this first phase], and of the second a delayed, PGE(2)-dependent T(c) rise [the late phase of fever]. Meanwhile-generated pyrogenic cytokines and their consequent upregulation of blood-brain barrier cells COX-2 also contribute to the latter rise. The consecutive steps that initiate the febrile response to LPS would now appear, therefore, to occur in an order different than conceived originally.
先天性免疫系统是宿主抵御入侵感染性病原体有害影响的第一道防线。发热是此类病原体进入人体后引发的防御机制中的一个标志。关于导致发热产生的步骤的传统观点是,这些步骤始于病原体刺激单核吞噬细胞产生致热细胞因子,细胞因子释放到循环系统中并运输到下丘脑前部视前区(POA)的体温调节中枢,然后在那里诱导环氧化酶(COX)-2依赖性前列腺素(PG)E2的产生,PG E2被认为是发热反应的最终介质。但过去5年积累的数据逐渐对这一经典概念提出了挑战,主要是因为新发现与这一系列事件在时间上不相符。因此,以前的研究通常忽略了细胞因子的产生及其致热信号转导为发热介质PGE2的过程相对缓慢,肯定比静脉注射细菌内毒素脂多糖(LPS)引起发热的起始潜伏期要慢得多。在此,我们回顾早期和近期发现之间的冲突,并总结调和许多矛盾的新数据。基于这些数据提出了一个统一的模型,解释发热反应的产生和维持。该模型假设LPS发热产生的步骤按以下顺序发生:LPS立即激活补体(C)级联反应,过敏毒素C成分C5a刺激库普弗细胞,随后库普弗细胞几乎瞬间释放PGE2,PGE2刺激肝迷走神经传入纤维,这些传入纤维通过腹侧去甲肾上腺素能束将诱导信号传递到POA,以及局部释放的去甲肾上腺素(NE)激活神经α1和胶质α2肾上腺素能受体。第一个受体的激活导致核心温度(T(c))立即出现与PGE2无关的升高[发热的早期阶段;然而,在此第一阶段伴随着抗氧化剂敏感的PGE2升高],第二个受体的激活导致延迟的、与PGE2相关的T(c)升高[发热的晚期阶段]。同时产生的致热细胞因子及其随后导致的血脑屏障细胞COX-2上调也促成了后者的升高。因此,引发对LPS发热反应的连续步骤现在看来发生的顺序与最初设想的不同。