Hayes-Lattin B, Leis J F, Maziarz R T
Center for Hematologic Malignancies, OHSU Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Sep;36(5):373-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705040.
Aggressive infection control measures that include isolating patients within protective hospital environments have become a standard practice during allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A wide range of interventions includes the management of ventilation systems, BMT unit construction and cleaning, isolation and barrier precautions, interactions with health-care workers and visitors, skin and oral care, infection surveillance, and the prevention of specific nosocomial and seasonal infections. However, many of these practices have not been definitively proven to provide patients the intended benefit of decreased infection rates or improved survival. Furthermore, each intervention comes with a financial and social cost. With institutional cost containment efforts and recent trials suggesting that patients may be safely cared for in the outpatient environment after allogeneic transplantation, many widely held practices in managing the transplant environment are being reconsidered. With changing practices, transplant teams are encouraged to review local patterns of infections and associated complications and communicate regularly with infection control committees for guidance on the evolution of isolation needs for the immunosuppressed patient.
在异基因干细胞移植期间,包括在防护性医院环境中隔离患者在内的积极感染控制措施已成为标准做法。一系列干预措施包括通风系统管理、骨髓移植单元建设与清洁、隔离和屏障预防措施、与医护人员及访客的互动、皮肤和口腔护理、感染监测以及预防特定的医院感染和季节性感染。然而,其中许多做法尚未得到明确证实能为患者带来降低感染率或提高生存率的预期益处。此外,每项干预措施都伴随着财务和社会成本。随着机构控制成本的努力以及近期试验表明异基因移植后患者在门诊环境中可能得到安全护理,许多在管理移植环境中广泛采用的做法正在重新审视。随着做法的改变,鼓励移植团队审查当地的感染模式及相关并发症,并定期与感染控制委员会沟通,以获取关于免疫抑制患者隔离需求演变的指导。