Dereure O, Vin F, Lazareth I, Bohbot S
Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France.
J Wound Care. 2005 Jun;14(6):265-71. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2005.14.6.26787.
To evaluate concordance with compression therapy in ambulatory patients with venous leg ulcers.
This was a prospective observational survey conducted in general practice. Consecutive patients with venous leg ulcers about to receive a non-adherent primary dressing and with no contraindication to compression bandaging were selected. At the inclusion visit, size, local aspect of the ulcer and the peri-ulcer skin were scored. Patients were asked about concordance with compression and were given a questionnaire to be completed at home. If patients were seen at a three-week follow-up visit, ulcer and peri-ulcer characteristics and concordance were reassessed.
A total of 2842 patients were included, of whom 2532 were re-evaluated at three weeks and 1397 (49%) returned their questionnaire. A compression bandage was already available for 62.9% of these patients, and 62.7% said they used it on a daily basis, 23.3% wore it one or two days per week and 13.7% wore it irregularly or never. There was a statistically significant correlation between concordance with compression and ulcer and peri-ulcer skin severity scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.042 respectively). At the follow-up visit, concordance with compression therapy improved (80.1% were wearing it regularly). Ulcer, peri-ulcer skin severity scores and ulcer size were significantly lower (p < 0.001) when concordance with compression therapy was good. However, 65.6% of patients considered applying compression very difficult; 45% considered it very unaesthetic and 23% judge wearing it to be very painful, while 9% thought it may worsen their ulcer.
On a short-term basis, concordance with compression can be substantially improved by simple measures with a clear favourable consequence on both ulcer status and peri-ulcer skin aspect when a non-adherent primary dressing is used. However, the acceptability of compression to patients is poor, and continuous effort is required to convince them of its importance.
评估门诊腿部静脉溃疡患者对加压治疗的依从性。
这是一项在全科医疗中进行的前瞻性观察性调查。选取即将接受非粘性初级敷料且无加压包扎禁忌证的连续性腿部静脉溃疡患者。在纳入访视时,对溃疡大小、局部情况以及溃疡周围皮肤进行评分。询问患者对加压治疗的依从情况,并给予一份问卷让其在家中完成。如果患者在三周随访时前来就诊,则重新评估溃疡及溃疡周围特征和依从性。
共纳入2842例患者,其中2532例在三周时接受重新评估,1397例(49%)返回了问卷。这些患者中有62.9%已经有加压绷带,62.7%表示他们每天使用,23.3%每周使用一到两天,13.7%使用不规律或从不使用。加压治疗的依从性与溃疡及溃疡周围皮肤严重程度评分之间存在统计学显著相关性(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.042)。在随访时,加压治疗的依从性有所改善(80.1%的患者定期使用)。当加压治疗依从性良好时,溃疡、溃疡周围皮肤严重程度评分及溃疡大小均显著降低(p < 0.001)。然而,65.6%的患者认为应用加压非常困难;45%认为其非常不美观,23%认为佩戴非常疼痛,而9%认为这可能会使他们的溃疡恶化。
短期内,当使用非粘性初级敷料时,通过简单措施可大幅提高加压治疗的依从性,这对溃疡状况和溃疡周围皮肤状况均有明显的有利影响。然而,患者对加压治疗的接受度较差,需要持续努力让他们认识到其重要性。