Cherian Thomas, Mulholland E Kim, Carlin John B, Ostensen Harald, Amin Ruhul, de Campo Margaret, Greenberg David, Lagos Rosanna, Lucero Marilla, Madhi Shabir A, O'Brien Katherine L, Obaro Steven, Steinhoff Mark C
Initiative for Vaccine Research, Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 May;83(5):353-9. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
Although radiological pneumonia is used as an outcome measure in epidemiological studies, there is considerable variability in the interpretation of chest radiographs. A standardized method for identifying radiological pneumonia would facilitate comparison of the results of vaccine trials and epidemiological studies of pneumonia.
A WHO working group developed definitions for radiological pneumonia. Inter-observer variability in categorizing a set of 222 chest radiographic images was measured by comparing the readings made by 20 radiologists and clinicians with a reference reading. Intra-observer variability was measured by comparing the initial readings of a randomly chosen subset of 100 radiographs with repeat readings made 8-30 days later.
Of the 222 images, 208 were considered interpretable. The reference reading categorized 43% of these images as showing alveolar consolidation or pleural effusion (primary end-point pneumonia); the proportion thus categorized by each of the 20 readers ranged from 8% to 61%. Using the reference reading as the gold standard, 14 of the 20 readers had sensitivity and specificity of > 0.70 in identifying primary end-point pneumonia; 13 out of 20 readers had a kappa index of > 0.6 compared with the reference reading. For the 92 radiographs deemed to be interpretable among the 100 images used for intra-observer variability, 19 out of 20 readers had a kappa index of > 0.6.
Using standardized definitions and training, it is possible to achieve agreement in identifying radiological pneumonia, thus facilitating the comparison of results of epidemiological studies that use radiological pneumonia as an outcome.
尽管在流行病学研究中,放射性肺炎被用作一项结局指标,但胸部X光片的解读存在相当大的差异。一种标准化的放射性肺炎识别方法将有助于比较疫苗试验和肺炎流行病学研究的结果。
一个世界卫生组织工作组制定了放射性肺炎的定义。通过比较20名放射科医生和临床医生的读片结果与一份参考读片结果,来测量对一组222张胸部X光片进行分类时的观察者间变异性。通过比较随机选择的100张X光片中一个子集的初始读片结果与8至30天后的重复读片结果,来测量观察者内变异性。
在222张图像中,208张被认为可解读。参考读片将其中43%的图像分类为显示肺泡实变或胸腔积液(主要终点肺炎);20名读者各自分类的比例从8%至61%不等。以参考读片作为金标准,20名读者中有14名在识别主要终点肺炎时的敏感性和特异性>0.70;与参考读片相比,20名读者中有13名的kappa指数>0.6。对于用于测量观察者内变异性的100张图像中被认为可解读的92张X光片,20名读者中有19名的kappa指数>0.6。
使用标准化定义和培训,在识别放射性肺炎方面有可能达成一致,从而便于比较将放射性肺炎作为结局的流行病学研究结果。