Williams Gabrielle J, Macaskill Petra, Kerr Marianne, Fitzgerald Dominic A, Isaacs David, Codarini Miriam, McCaskill Mary, Prelog Kristina, Craig Jonathan C
School of Public Health, Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013 Dec;48(12):1195-200. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22806. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
Consolidation on chest radiography is widely used as the reference standard for defining pneumonia and variability in interpretation is well known but not well explored or explained.
Three pediatric sub-specialists (infectious diseases, radiology and respiratory medicine) viewed 3,033 chest radiographs in children aged under 5 years of age who presented to one Emergency Department (ED) with a febrile illness. Radiographs were viewed blind to clinical information about the child and blind to findings of other readers. Each chest radiograph was identified as positive or negative for consolidation. Percentage agreement and kappa scores were calculated for pairs of readers. Prevalence of consolidation and reader sensitivity/specificity was estimated using latent class analysis.
Using the majority rule, 456 (15%) chest radiographs were positive for consolidation while the latent class estimate was 17%. The radiologist was most likely (21.3%) and respiratory physician least likely (13.7%) to diagnose consolidation. Overall percentage agreement for pairs of readers was 85-90%. However, chance corrected agreement between the readers was moderate, with kappa scores 0.4-0.6 and did not vary with patient characteristics (age, gender, and presence of chronic illness). Estimated sensitivity ranged from 0.71 to 0.81 across readers, and specificity 0.91 to 0.98.
Overall agreement for identification of consolidation on chest radiographs was good, but agreement adjusted for chance was only moderate and did not vary with patient characteristics. Clinicians need to be aware that chest radiography is an imperfect test for diagnosing pneumonia and has considerable variability in its interpretation.
胸部X光片上的实变影被广泛用作定义肺炎的参考标准,其解读的变异性是众所周知的,但尚未得到充分研究或解释。
三位儿科亚专科医生(传染病、放射科和呼吸内科)查看了3033张5岁以下因发热性疾病就诊于某急诊科的儿童胸部X光片。阅片时对患儿的临床信息以及其他阅片者的结果均不知情。每张胸部X光片被判定为实变影阳性或阴性。计算阅片者两两之间的百分比一致性和kappa值。使用潜在类别分析估计实变影的患病率以及阅片者的敏感度/特异度。
采用多数规则,456张(15%)胸部X光片实变影阳性,而潜在类别分析估计为17%。放射科医生诊断实变影的可能性最大(21.3%),呼吸内科医生最小(13.7%)。阅片者两两之间的总体百分比一致性为85%-90%。然而,阅片者之间校正机遇后的一致性为中等,kappa值为0.4-0.6,且不随患者特征(年龄、性别和慢性病情况)而变化。各阅片者估计的敏感度范围为0.71至0.81,特异度为0.91至0.98。
胸部X光片实变影识别的总体一致性良好,但校正机遇后的一致性仅为中等,且不随患者特征而变化。临床医生需要意识到,胸部X光片对于诊断肺炎是一项不完善的检查,其解读存在相当大的变异性。