• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Improved surgical outcome by modification of porcine dermal collagen implant in abdominal wall reconstruction in rats.

作者信息

Zheng Fang, Verbeken Eric, de Ridder Dirk, Deprest Jan

机构信息

Center for Surgical Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(4):362-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.20148.

DOI:10.1002/nau.20148
PMID:15977258
Abstract

AIM

We earlier showed in rats that fascial repair with Pelvicol, a porcine dermal collagen implant, was associated with a lesser inflammatory response but lower tensile strength in the early postoperative period as compared to Prolene. Herein we wanted to evaluate whether creation of pores in Pelvicol, facilitating ingrowth of fibrous tissue and vessels, would result in a higher tensile strength at d30 without compromising longer term results.

METHODS

First tensile strength of Pelvicol modified with different pore sizes was evaluated ex vivo. In a second step, Pelvicol implants with pores were used to cover full-thickness abdominal wall defects in 36 rats. Implants were either Pelvicol (non-porous) or with pores of Phi : 0.7, 1.2, or 2.0 mm (n=6 each). Animals were sacrificed on d30 and 90 to evaluate the presence of herniation, infection, adhesions, change in thickness and tensile strength. Histopathology was performed to assess inflammatory response and collagen deposition. Data were compared to available data on Prolene implanted animals at same time points.

RESULTS

Pelvicol with pore diameter of 2.5 mm was significantly weaker ex vivo. Animals repaired with non-porous material did develop seroma (2/6) or clinical infection (1/6) whereas none in the other groups did. There was a trend for increasing tensile strength at 30 d with increasing pore diameter, being significant in the 2.0-mm pore size group. This difference disappeared by 90 d, where all materials were equally strong as Prolene. The foreign body reaction was less intense in a pore-size dependent manner, with more abundant neo-vascularization and collagen deposition passing through the pores.

CONCLUSION

Creation of pores in Pelvicol promotes neo-vascularization, collagen deposition, and fibrous tissue ingrowth, and at pore size 2.0 mm tensile strength was increased at d30 whereafter all materials had comparable strength.

摘要

相似文献

1
Improved surgical outcome by modification of porcine dermal collagen implant in abdominal wall reconstruction in rats.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(4):362-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.20148.
2
Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model.大鼠模型中使用猪真皮胶原蛋白重建腹壁缺损后的宿主反应。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;191(6):1961-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.091.
3
Porous acellular porcine dermal collagen implants to repair fascial defects in a rat model: biomechanical evaluation up to 180 days.多孔去细胞猪真皮胶原植入物修复大鼠模型中的筋膜缺损:180 天内的生物力学评估。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;68(3):205-12. doi: 10.1159/000235852. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
4
Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model.大鼠模型中宿主对聚丙烯和非交联猪小肠黏膜来源胶原植入物反应的比较。
BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1554-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00688.x.
5
Biomechanical findings in rats undergoing fascial reconstruction with graft materials suggested as an alternative to polypropylene.在使用被认为可替代聚丙烯的移植物材料进行筋膜重建的大鼠中发现的生物力学结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Mar;29(3):488-93. doi: 10.1002/nau.20755.
6
Comparison of Surgisis, AlloDerm, and Vicryl Woven Mesh grafts for abdominal wall defect repair in an animal model.在动物模型中比较 Surgisis、AlloDerm 和 Vicryl 编织网片移植物在腹壁缺损修复中的应用。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010 Jun;34(3):290-6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9449-2. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
7
Fate of collagen-based implants used in pelvic floor surgery: a 2-year follow-up study in a rabbit model.盆底手术中使用的胶原基植入物的转归:兔模型的2年随访研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):94.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.032.
8
[Porcine acellular dermal matrix for repair of abdominal wall defects in rabbit model].[猪脱细胞真皮基质用于兔模型腹壁缺损修复]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;25(7):884-8.
9
The biomechanical behavior and host response to porcine-derived small intestine submucosa, pericardium and dermal matrix acellular grafts in a rat abdominal defect model.猪源性小肠黏膜下层、心包和脱细胞真皮基质移植物在大鼠腹部缺损模型中的生物力学行为和宿主反应。
Biomaterials. 2011 Oct;32(29):7086-95. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
10
The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs.不同孔径对两种聚丙烯网片修复腹部缺损生物相容性的影响。犬类实验研究。
Hernia. 2001 Jun;5(2):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s100290100001.

引用本文的文献

1
Rabbit as an animal model for the study of biological grafts in pelvic floor dysfunctions.兔作为研究盆底功能障碍中生物移植物的动物模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 18;11(1):10545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89698-z.
2
Functional Results after Repair of Large Hiatal Hernia by Use of a Biologic Mesh.使用生物补片修复大型食管裂孔疝后的功能结果
Front Surg. 2016 Mar 9;3:16. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00016. eCollection 2016.
3
Comparison of graft-reinforced repairs and suture repair using a novel biomechanical test.使用新型生物力学测试比较移植物增强修复和缝合修复。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2787-5. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
4
Laparoscopic augmentation of the diaphragmatic hiatus with biologic mesh versus suture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物补片与缝合修复腹腔镜下膈肌裂孔扩大术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jul;400(5):577-83. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1312-0. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
5
Long-term outcomes after native tissue vs. biological graft-augmented repair in the posterior compartment.后间隔区自体组织与生物移植物增强修复后的长期疗效
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 May;23(5):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1607-9. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
6
Experimental comparison of abdominal wall repair using different methods of enhancement by small intestinal submucosa graft.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Apr;20(4):435-41. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0793-6. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
7
Xenograft use in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature.异种移植在骨盆重建手术中的应用:文献综述
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 May;18(5):555-63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0288-2. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
8
The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair.筋膜缺损背后的生物学原理以及植入物在盆腔器官脱垂修复中的应用。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun;17 Suppl 1:S16-25. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0101-2.