Department of General Surgery, Zhabei District Central Hospital, Zhabei Branch Hospital, Shanghai Chang Zheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Zhabei District, Shanghai, PR China.
Biomaterials. 2011 Oct;32(29):7086-95. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
Several porcine-derived acellular biologic grafts are increasingly used in abdominal wall reconstruction due to the limitations of synthetic meshes in many clinical situations. However, relatively little is known so far about their comparative mechanical characteristics and performance after defect repair. We therefore investigated three most commonly used porcine-derived acellular biomaterials, small intestine submucosa (P-SIS), pericardium (P-PC) and acellular dermal matrix (P-ADM) immediately after prepared, and their effectiveness, biomechanical and histological characteristics in repairing full-thickness abdominal defect in a rat model. P-PC had the best native performance in the burst strength, tensile strength and ball burst among the three porcine-derived scaffolds. P-SIS showed a significantly higher water vapor transmission in comparison with P-PC or P-ADM. Abdominal wall defects in rats were all satisfied repaired with P-SIS, P-PC or P-ADM. No laxity or fistula was observed in the repaired abdominal wall in the P-SIS group up to 8 weeks after surgery. However, there was a tendency for high postoperative abdominal eventration in the P-ADM and P-PC groups as compared with the P-SIS group. With regard to overall aspects of the postoperative laxity, intra-abdominal adhesion formation, tensile stress, stretchability, and degree of tissue ingrowth in terms of collagen deposition and neovascularization, P-SIS exhibits clear advantages over P-PC as well as P-ADM after large abdominal wall defect reconstruction.
由于在许多临床情况下合成网片存在局限性,越来越多的猪源性去细胞生物移植物被用于腹壁重建。然而,目前对于它们在缺陷修复后的比较机械特性和性能知之甚少。因此,我们研究了三种最常用的猪源性去细胞生物材料,即小肠黏膜下层(P-SIS)、心包(P-PC)和去细胞真皮基质(P-ADM),在制备后立即研究了它们的有效性、生物力学和组织学特征,以及在大鼠全层腹壁缺损模型中的修复作用。在三种猪源性支架中,P-PC 的爆破强度、拉伸强度和球爆破强度的原始性能最好。与 P-PC 或 P-ADM 相比,P-SIS 的水蒸气透过率明显更高。P-SIS、P-PC 或 P-ADM 均可满意修复大鼠腹壁缺损。术后 8 周内,P-SIS 组修复的腹壁无松弛或瘘管。然而,与 P-SIS 组相比,P-ADM 和 P-PC 组术后有腹壁膨出的趋势。就术后腹壁松弛、腹腔内粘连形成、拉伸应力、拉伸性以及胶原沉积和新生血管化方面的组织内生长程度等整体方面而言,P-SIS 在大型腹壁缺损重建后明显优于 P-PC 和 P-ADM。