Suppr超能文献

幽门肌切开术:腹腔镜、脐周及右上腹手术技术的比较

Pyloromyotomy: a comparison of laparoscopic, circumumbilical, and right upper quadrant operative techniques.

作者信息

Kim Stephen S, Lau Stanley T, Lee Steven L, Schaller Robert, Healey Patrick J, Ledbetter Daniel J, Sawin Robert S, Waldhausen John H T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ramstedt pyloromyotomy through a right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision has been the traditional treatment for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Recently, laparoscopic (LAP) and circumumbilical (UMB) approaches have been introduced as alternative methods to improve cosmesis, but concerns about greater operative times, costs, and complications remain. This study compares the three operative techniques and examines their advantages and complication rates.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing pyloromyotomy at a children's hospital between January 1997 and June 2003.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety patients underwent pyloromyotomy by LAP (n = 51), RUQ (n = 190), or UMB (n = 49). Complication rate, time to ad libitum feeding, incidence of emesis, and postoperative length of stay did not differ considerably among groups. Two LAP patients were converted to RUQ. Mucosal perforation occurred in three patients each in the RUQ and UMB groups, but none in the LAP group. Operative times were considerably less for LAP (25 +/- 9 minutes) than for RUQ (32 +/- 9 minutes) and UMB (42 +/- 12 minutes) (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Bonferroni). Charges related to operations and anesthesia were considerably greater for UMB (operation: US 1,574 dollars +/- US 433 dollars; anesthesia: US 731 dollars +/- US 190 dollars) compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Bonferroni), but did not differ between LAP (operation: US 1,299 dollars +/- US 311 dollars; anesthesia: US 586 dollars +/- US 137 dollars) and RUQ (operation: US 1,237 dollars +/- US 411 dollars; anesthesia: US 578 dollars +/- US 167 dollars). Data are presented as mean +/- SD.

CONCLUSIONS

Advantages of LAP include a shorter mean operative time without higher complications or costs. UMB is associated with the greatest mean operative time and costs. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is a safe and effective approach to the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

摘要

背景

经右上腹(RUQ)横切口行兰施泰德幽门肌切开术一直是肥厚性幽门狭窄的传统治疗方法。近来,腹腔镜(LAP)和脐周(UMB)入路作为改善美观的替代方法被引入,但人们仍担心手术时间更长、费用更高以及并发症更多。本研究比较了这三种手术技术,并探讨了它们的优势和并发症发生率。

研究设计

我们对1997年1月至2003年6月期间在一家儿童医院接受幽门肌切开术的患者进行了回顾性研究。

结果

290例患者接受了LAP(n = 51)、RUQ(n = 190)或UMB(n = 49)幽门肌切开术。各组之间的并发症发生率、随意进食时间、呕吐发生率和术后住院时间差异不大。2例LAP患者转为RUQ手术。RUQ组和UMB组各有3例患者发生黏膜穿孔,而LAP组无。LAP的平均手术时间(25±9分钟)明显短于RUQ(32±9分钟)和UMB(42±12分钟)(p < 0.05,方差分析,Bonferroni检验)。与其他两组相比,UMB的手术及麻醉相关费用明显更高(手术:1574美元±433美元;麻醉:731美元±190美元)(p < 0.05,方差分析,Bonferroni检验),但LAP(手术:1299美元±311美元;麻醉:586美元±137美元)和RUQ(手术:1237美元±411美元;麻醉:578美元±167美元)之间无差异。数据以均值±标准差表示。

结论

LAP的优势包括平均手术时间较短,且并发症或费用不会更高。UMB的平均手术时间和费用最高。腹腔镜幽门肌切开术是治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄的一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验