Suppr超能文献

幽门肌切开术手术方法的评估:单中心经验

Evaluation of surgical approaches to pyloromyotomy: a single-center experience.

作者信息

Taqi Esmaeel, Boutros John, Emil Sherif, Dubé Sébastien, Puligandla Pramod, Flageole Hélène, Laberge Jean-Martin

机构信息

Division of Clinical Research and Pediatric General Surgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada H3H 1P3.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2007 May;42(5):865-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.051.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of various approaches to pyloromyotomy: supraumbilical (SU), right upper quadrant (RUQ), and laparoscopic (LP).

METHODS

Single-center retrospective review from 1998 to 2005 with institutional review board approval, evaluating 192 pyloromyotomies based on surgical approach: RUQ (119), SU (64), and LP (9). Patient demographics, acid-base/electrolyte status on presentation, mean operative time, postoperative length of stay, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, acid-base/electrolyte status, and mean operative time were not significantly different. The median length of stay was 34, 29, and 24.5 hours for SU, RUQ, and LP, respectively (P = .479). The frequency of duodenal/gastric perforations in the SU, RUQ, and LP groups were 1, 4, and 1, respectively. The LP perforation was not recognized intraoperatively, resulting in sepsis and multiorgan failure. One patient in the SU group had a late adhesive bowel obstruction requiring laparotomy and bowel resection. Wound infection rates did not differ significantly between groups (SU, 4; RUQ, 2; LP, 1; P = .113).

CONCLUSION

Pyloromyotomy is associated with a low complication rate. Cosmetically, SU is superior to the RUQ approach. The added benefits of being able to examine the integrity of the duodenal mucosa intraoperatively and its short learning curve may make SU a safer alternative to LP for surgeons who are still practicing the RUQ approach.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估各种幽门肌切开术方法的结果:脐上(SU)、右上腹(RUQ)和腹腔镜(LP)。

方法

在机构审查委员会批准下,对1998年至2005年进行单中心回顾性研究,根据手术方法评估192例幽门肌切开术:RUQ(119例)、SU(64例)和LP(9例)。评估患者人口统计学特征、就诊时的酸碱/电解质状态、平均手术时间、术后住院时间和并发症。

结果

患者人口统计学特征、酸碱/电解质状态和平均手术时间无显著差异。SU、RUQ和LP组的中位住院时间分别为34、29和24.5小时(P = 0.479)。SU、RUQ和LP组十二指肠/胃穿孔的发生率分别为1、4和1。LP穿孔术中未被识别,导致败血症和多器官功能衰竭。SU组有1例患者发生晚期粘连性肠梗阻,需要剖腹手术和肠切除。各组间伤口感染率无显著差异(SU组4例;RUQ组2例;LP组1例;P = 0.113)。

结论

幽门肌切开术的并发症发生率较低。在美容方面,SU优于RUQ方法。能够在术中检查十二指肠黏膜完整性及其较短的学习曲线所带来的额外益处,可能使SU对于仍采用RUQ方法的外科医生而言是比LP更安全的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验